CONTACTTRAFFICABOUT TOM VANDERBILTOTHER WRITING CONTACT ABOUT THE BOOK

The Curious Psychology of Bumper Stickers

Bumper Fi. Photo by Jason Tromm/Flickr.

While I was out of the country, a new study on bumper stickers was hitting the media. As it touches upon on a number of things discussed in Traffic, the study, “Territorial Markings as a Predictor of Driver Aggression and Road Rage,” by William J. Szlemko, Jacob A. Benfield, Paul A. Bell, Jerry L. Deffenbacher, and Lucy Troup, all of Colorado State University, was right up my alley.

The study, published in the June issue of the Journal of Applied Social Psychology, essentially seeks to explain what part of aggressive driving behavior might be caused by the very environment of traffic, and the way we understand it and inhabit it. Working partly from a previous theory (i.e., I. Altman, The Environment and Social Behavior), the authors delineate the different types of space we inhabit: Primary, Secondary, and Public. A primary territory would be one’s home; a secondary would be a space one inhabits temporarily (the office); while public territory would be a park bench. One interesting source of tension noted by Altman is when one type of space (primary) is adjacent to another (public). When these are adjacent, “the potential for miscommunication and conflict increases as a result of confusion of social norms for each territory type.”

This is exactly the kind of situation we have in traffic: We sit in our own cars, occasionally acting like they are rooms closed off from the rest of the world; but most of the time we drive, save for our own garage, we drive in a public setting. As the authors note, however, some “boundary confusion” exists: “How many times have drivers uttered the phrase ‘He just got into my lane?’ ”

If one of the hallmarks of primary space is a tendency to mark it in some way, to define one’s territory, the authors speculated, then the opportunity for boundary confusion might be highest among those most committed to marking territoriality over their primary space. Thus, they argued, people who personalized their vehicles, and reported showing the most attachment to their vehicles, would act most aggressively to defend their territory in the transitional spaces of traffic.

And this is precisely what they found, in a self-reported survey of college students: “Both number of territory markers (e.g., bumper stickers, decals) and attachment to the vehicle were significant predictors of aggressive driving.”

While I found the study novel in its approach, and its implications fascinating, I was left with a few questions.

First, there’s the obvious shortcomings with self-reported questionnaires (and among small sample sizes of students at one college). The questions themselves often have their own power to influence the answers, and I’m not really sure I would even know how to quantify something like “attachment to my vehicle” on a scale from one to seven (and the answer would certainly have varied last weekend when I had to get new struts put on to the week before, when the car was running well).

Secondly, I’m wondering whether bumper stickers really signify attachment to one’s vehicle. If you’ve just shelled out 75K for a new 7-series BMW, does the driver really show their devotion to that vehicle by putting a $1.50 bumper sticker that says: “Archaeologists Do It in the Dirt”? Purely based on my own experience, I find that older vehicles tend to have more bumper stickers than newer vehicles (because, let’s face it, isn’t a car bearing dozens of bumper stickers really sending the message: “I don’t really care all that much about this car.”). Maybe attachment grows with age (e.g., you call your heap “Old Bessie” or some such), but perhaps with hedonic adaptation the lustful glow of that new car has faded.

Thirdly, my own pet theory is that one of the reasons people put bumper stickers on their car relates to narcissism — another factor that has been implicated in aggressive driving. The person who insists on telling you they vacation at Martha’s Vineyard (those annoying little “MV” stickers) may feel a certain superiority to others on the road, or is the type of person who is not used to having their perceived superiority questioned in other areas of life and so isn’t likely to on the road either. Somewhat relatedly, I’d be curious on the role of “vanity plates” in a study like this; they too would presumably be overrepresented as those claiming more aggressive driving — in either the territoriality or narcissism explantation.

Fourthly, there’s a national issue here that needs addressing, in my opinion. Drivers in the U.S., as any visitor to another country will notice, have a much higher tendency to put bumper stickers on their cars. Are people in the U.S. simply more territorial? Are we still, as a nation, conquering that frontier, staking our claim to our dubiously acquired land gains? Is it a function of our almost fetishistic attachment to free speech? Is there something in our national character that compels us to broadcast our small tokens of identity to an audience that really doesn’t care? If people in other countries don’t really display so many bumper stickers, are they demonstrating territoriality in traffic in some other way, and does it differ from the way bumper-stickered drivers in the U.S. do?

Fifthly, the authors report that the content of the bumper sticker didn’t matter when it came to reporting aggressivity. I wonder if this really tracks to the general population. Are people with NRA stickers really little bundles of altruistic joy on the road, and are people urging us to ‘Practice Random Acts of Kindness’ really always tailgating us and cutting us off? My own experience is an emphatic no, though I may be falling for some as-yet taxonomied psychological bias. I would be curious to see a study that compared crash rates of vehicles with bumper stickers versus those without (this would be very difficult; an easier one would be to measure speed and following distance of vehicles with bumper stickers versus those without).

As an addendum to these last two points, a friend in China reports that a newly emerging custom, in Shanghai at least, seems to involve covering one’s car in, er, cartoons. Comparing the photo below with the one that opened the blog post, are these really part of a similar strategy of territorial marking, betraying similar tendencies toward aggressive driving? Beware the wolf in Hello Kitty clothing…

(P.S. As an another addendum, I recently learned that “do you have a bumper sticker?” and “what does it say?” are common questions in voir dire, or jury selection).

http://flickr.com/photos/_borna/469878764/
[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Yahoo!]

This entry was posted on Monday, June 30th, 2008 at 1:55 pm and is filed under Cars, Drivers, Traffic Psychology, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “The Curious Psychology of Bumper Stickers”

  1. Sam Says:

    Very interesting! This is something I’ve always wondered about living in Massachusetts but not being a native of this state. I’ve noticed that the local drivers with liberal-leaning bumper stickers (lots of them here) tend also to be more aggressive drivers.

    Also, in February I was rear-ended on the highway by a younger driver who told me that he was reading my “interesting” bumper stickers. One of them was “Aragorn/Gandalf 08″ and the other was a pro-life bumper sticker. After the body work, I now have refrained from putting bumper stickers on my car. As we approach the coming election, I may put one back on and pray for no more accidents.

  2. gwadzilla Says:

    funny…

    the conservative has made observations on the driving of liberals
    which contradicts my personal findings

    as a cyclist there are many things to look at for cues on what to expect

    make and model of car
    condition of car
    from there it goes on…

    the bumper stickers
    well…
    I would like to say that the stickers indicate how someone would drive
    but I am not so certain that my findings are unbiased

    we often see what we want to see

    I think that road rage is dangerous
    when driving it pisses me off more if a person does something obnoxious or ignorant and then I do not agree with the political beliefs stated on their bumper sticker

    I have bumper stickers on my car
    most of them bicycle or mountain bike related
    political bumper stickers…
    well… as it may be a place to showcase your ideals
    the highway is a dangerous place to start the discussion

    DC is not only international
    but very diverse nationally

    drivers from Massachusetts have a reputation for driving like MASS-Holes!

Leave a Reply

Traffic Tom Vanderbilt

How We Drive is the companion blog to Tom Vanderbilt’s New York Times bestselling book, Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says About Us), published by Alfred A. Knopf in the U.S. and Canada, Penguin in the U.K, and in languages other than English by a number of other fine publishers worldwide.

Please send tips, news, research papers, links, photos (bad road signs, outrageous bumper stickers, spectacularly awful acts of driving or parking or anything traffic-related), or ideas for my Slate.com Transport column to me at: info@howwedrive.com.

For publicity inquiries, please contact Kate Runde at Vintage: krunde@randomhouse.com.

For editorial inquiries, please contact Zoe Pagnamenta at The Zoe Pagnamenta Agency: zoe@zpagency.com.

For speaking engagement inquiries, please contact
Kim Thornton at the Random House Speakers Bureau: rhspeakers@randomhouse.com.

Order Traffic from:

Amazon | B&N | Borders
Random House | Powell’s

[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Yahoo!]
U.S. Paperback UK Paperback
Traffic UK
Drive-on-the-left types can order the book from Amazon.co.uk.

For UK publicity enquiries please contact Rosie Glaisher at Penguin.

Upcoming Talks

April 9, 2008.
California Office of Traffic Safety Summit
San Francisco, CA.

May 19, 2009
University of Minnesota Center for Transportation Studies
Bloomington, MN

June 23, 2009
Driving Assessment 2009
Big Sky, Montana

June 26, 2009
PRI World Congress
Rotterdam, The Netherlands

June 27, 2009
Day of Architecture
Utrecht, The Netherlands

July 13, 2009
Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals (ATSIP)
Phoenix, AZ.

August 12-14
Texas Department of Transportation “Save a Life Summit”
San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2009
Governors Highway Safety Association Annual Meeting
Savannah, Georgia

September 11, 2009
Oregon Transportation Summit
Portland, Oregon

October 8
Honda R&D Americas
Raymond, Ohio

October 10-11
INFORMS Roundtable
San Diego, CA

October 21, 2009
California State University-San Bernardino, Leonard Transportation Center
San Bernardino, CA

November 5
Southern New England Planning Association Planning Conference
Uncasville, Connecticut

January 6
Texas Transportation Forum
Austin, TX

January 19
Yale University
(with Donald Shoup; details to come)

Monday, February 22
Yale University School of Architecture
Eero Saarinen Lecture

Friday, March 19
University of Delaware
Delaware Center for Transportation

April 5-7
University of Utah
Salt Lake City
McMurrin Lectureship

April 19
International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (Organization Management Workshop)
Austin, Texas

Monday, April 26
Edmonton Traffic Safety Conference
Edmonton, Canada

Monday, June 7
Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals
Niagara Falls, Ontario

Wednesday, July 6
Fondo de Prevención Vial
Bogotá, Colombia

Tuesday, August 31
Royal Automobile Club
Perth, Australia

Wednesday, September 1
Australasian Road Safety Conference
Canberra, Australia

Wednesday, September 22

Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s
Traffic Incident Management Enhancement Program
Statewide Conference
Wisconsin Dells, WI

Wednesday, October 20
Rutgers University
Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation
Piscataway, NJ

Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Ontario Injury Prevention Resource Centre
Injury Prevention Forum
Toronto

Monday, May 2
Idaho Public Driver Education Conference
Boise, Idaho

Tuesday, June 2, 2011
California Association of Cities
Costa Mesa, California

Sunday, August 21, 2011
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Attitudes: Iniciativa Social de Audi
Madrid, Spain

April 16, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Gardens Theatre, QUT
Brisbane, Australia

April 17, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Centennial Plaza, Sydney
Sydney, Australia

April 19, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Melbourne Town Hall
Melbourne, Australia

January 30, 2013
University of Minnesota City Engineers Association Meeting
Minneapolis, MN

January 31, 2013
Metropolis and Mobile Life
School of Architecture, University of Toronto

February 22, 2013
ISL Engineering
Edmonton, Canada

March 1, 2013
Australian Road Summit
Melbourne, Australia

May 8, 2013
New York State Association of
Transportation Engineers
Rochester, NY

August 18, 2013
BoingBoing.com “Ingenuity” Conference
San Francisco, CA

September 26, 2013
TransComm 2013
(Meeting of American Association
of State Highway and Transportation
Officials’ Subcommittee on Transportation
Communications.
Grand Rapids MI

 

 

[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Yahoo!]
Twitter
June 2008
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30