Manchester Rejects Congestion Charging

Voters in Manchester, the city that invented commuter rail travel, has rejected congestion charging, in essence saying no to nearly three billion pounds in government investment for public transport that would have been theirs had they said yes.

The cost they deemed too high, by the way, for earning that three billion quid and turning the city into a capital of first-class public transport, was as follows:

“Drivers will pay £2 for crossing the outer ring in the morning, and a further £1 for crossing the inner ring.

Outward peak-time journeys will cost £1 for passing the inner ring and £1 for passing the outer ring.”

Penny-wise, pound foolish?

This entry was posted on Friday, December 12th, 2008 at 2:52 pm and is filed under Cities, Congestion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Manchester Rejects Congestion Charging”

  1. Brad Templeton Says:

    It’s rather unusual to see a public vote go 80% no, 20% yes. The reason it’s so rare is that people are not so stupid as to spend all the money and effort to put something up for a vote when it’s so lopsided. Normally anybody can read this sort of sentiment without a vote and not waste the voter’s time.

    So why did they go ahead with such a vote anyway? Was it mandated by some committee with their heads in the sand? Was there a better proposal that got substituted out?

    Congestion charging is not a bad idea to limit cars in an area, but it usually requires rather nasty privacy-invasive technologies, including RFIDs or cameras tracking everybody’s movements.

    Why is it preferred over a simpler tax on certain patterns of parking lot use? You want to park during rush hour, you want to leave during rush hour, pay a fat parking tax. For corporate parking lots that don’t charge and can’t count employees, put in a simple car counter. People with personal garages would get a by unless we forced them to put a car sensor in their own garage, but how many of them are there. Of course, on-street parking should not even be available during rush hour, or heavily surcharged.

    Now no need to track where everybody goes.

  2. Karl-On-Sea (Twitter: @karlonsea) Says:

    Yep – it’s penny rich and pound foolish for two reasons:
    1. The result.
    2. Like Brad says – for even bothering with the referendum in the first place. I thought the reason we elected representatives was to avoid having to take decisions, safe in the knowledge that those we elected would do what was ultimately in our interests. They get to stay in power long enough for us to judge the result, rather than us being swayed by our prejudices of the moment as is often the case in referenda.

  3. Julian Beach Says:

    I live in Manchester and the result is depressing. Very few people we know where going to vote yes, even if they were not going to be directly effected by the charge. But then, most of the people we know don’t use public transport anyway and I think they saw the charge as another tax. A lot of people just saw the charge and not the benefits or the limited impact it would have on most people. The charge was to limit peak hour travel and only applied into the direction of peak traffic flow – into the city in the morning, and out in the evening. Avoid those times and there is no charge. There was a mobile telephone interview on the day of the result with a driver who was unable to get into the radio studio or his office because of traffic – he was voting against the charge.

    As Brad notes, there are other ways for the Council to limit car travel into the city (close a couple of car parks, or close some roads in the centre), but none of those will have the investment in public transport.

    As for the Council(s), well they are indeed stupid for wasting a great deal of public money on what must have been a foregone conclusion. They could probably have introduced the legislation without the referendum, but the no vote has killed all chances of trying again. Any conspiracy theorists are welcome to comment at this point!

Leave a Reply

Traffic Tom Vanderbilt

How We Drive is the companion blog to Tom Vanderbilt’s New York Times bestselling book, Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says About Us), published by Alfred A. Knopf in the U.S. and Canada, Penguin in the U.K, and in languages other than English by a number of other fine publishers worldwide.

Please send tips, news, research papers, links, photos (bad road signs, outrageous bumper stickers, spectacularly awful acts of driving or parking or anything traffic-related), or ideas for my Transport column to me at:

For publicity inquiries, please contact Kate Runde at Vintage:

For editorial inquiries, please contact Zoe Pagnamenta at The Zoe Pagnamenta Agency:

For speaking engagement inquiries, please contact
Kim Thornton at the Random House Speakers Bureau:

Order Traffic from:

Amazon | B&N | Borders
Random House | Powell’s

U.S. Paperback UK Paperback
Traffic UK
Drive-on-the-left types can order the book from

For UK publicity enquiries please contact Rosie Glaisher at Penguin.

Upcoming Talks

April 9, 2008.
California Office of Traffic Safety Summit
San Francisco, CA.

May 19, 2009
University of Minnesota Center for Transportation Studies
Bloomington, MN

June 23, 2009
Driving Assessment 2009
Big Sky, Montana

June 26, 2009
PRI World Congress
Rotterdam, The Netherlands

June 27, 2009
Day of Architecture
Utrecht, The Netherlands

July 13, 2009
Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals (ATSIP)
Phoenix, AZ.

August 12-14
Texas Department of Transportation “Save a Life Summit”
San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2009
Governors Highway Safety Association Annual Meeting
Savannah, Georgia

September 11, 2009
Oregon Transportation Summit
Portland, Oregon

October 8
Honda R&D Americas
Raymond, Ohio

October 10-11
INFORMS Roundtable
San Diego, CA

October 21, 2009
California State University-San Bernardino, Leonard Transportation Center
San Bernardino, CA

November 5
Southern New England Planning Association Planning Conference
Uncasville, Connecticut

January 6
Texas Transportation Forum
Austin, TX

January 19
Yale University
(with Donald Shoup; details to come)

Monday, February 22
Yale University School of Architecture
Eero Saarinen Lecture

Friday, March 19
University of Delaware
Delaware Center for Transportation

April 5-7
University of Utah
Salt Lake City
McMurrin Lectureship

April 19
International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (Organization Management Workshop)
Austin, Texas

Monday, April 26
Edmonton Traffic Safety Conference
Edmonton, Canada

Monday, June 7
Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals
Niagara Falls, Ontario

Wednesday, July 6
Fondo de Prevención Vial
Bogotá, Colombia

Tuesday, August 31
Royal Automobile Club
Perth, Australia

Wednesday, September 1
Australasian Road Safety Conference
Canberra, Australia

Wednesday, September 22

Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s
Traffic Incident Management Enhancement Program
Statewide Conference
Wisconsin Dells, WI

Wednesday, October 20
Rutgers University
Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation
Piscataway, NJ

Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Ontario Injury Prevention Resource Centre
Injury Prevention Forum

Monday, May 2
Idaho Public Driver Education Conference
Boise, Idaho

Tuesday, June 2, 2011
California Association of Cities
Costa Mesa, California

Sunday, August 21, 2011
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Attitudes: Iniciativa Social de Audi
Madrid, Spain

April 16, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Gardens Theatre, QUT
Brisbane, Australia

April 17, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Centennial Plaza, Sydney
Sydney, Australia

April 19, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Melbourne Town Hall
Melbourne, Australia

January 30, 2013
University of Minnesota City Engineers Association Meeting
Minneapolis, MN

January 31, 2013
Metropolis and Mobile Life
School of Architecture, University of Toronto

February 22, 2013
ISL Engineering
Edmonton, Canada

March 1, 2013
Australian Road Summit
Melbourne, Australia

May 8, 2013
New York State Association of
Transportation Engineers
Rochester, NY

August 18, 2013 “Ingenuity” Conference
San Francisco, CA

September 26, 2013
TransComm 2013
(Meeting of American Association
of State Highway and Transportation
Officials’ Subcommittee on Transportation
Grand Rapids MI



December 2008
« Nov   Jan »

No, you probably won be compensated one million dollars; however, with the right blend of negotiating skills and patience, your efforts will be substantially rewarded!I have seen up to forty thousand dollars added to starting compensation through diligent negotiations. It is a way to significantly raise your standard of living and sense of self, simply by