<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Don&#8217;s Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/20/a-dons-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/20/a-dons-education/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bossi</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/20/a-dons-education/#comment-6646</link>
		<dc:creator>Bossi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=736#comment-6646</guid>
		<description>Only two years ago, I was an ardent believer in that motorists were to blame for everything: speeding, running red lights, and driving themselves off the road.  Since then, however, I've become more convinced that we -- transportation engineers and politics -- have all inadvertently conspired to be the cause of such behavior.  I no longer believe people want to break the law; we just encourage them to do so.

If a road is designed such that a user can comfortably drive 50 MPH and we post it 30... of course there will be speeding.  If we have a straightaway whereby users could drive 200 MPH and then we throw in a 15 MPH curve... signing doesn't cut it; the speed needs to be reduced geometrically.  Every problem, with adequate resources, can be mitigated through design.

Education &#38; enforcement vs. engineering; protection &#38; warning vs. hazard removal... so much will &#38; resources are spent on band-aid treatments.  Granted, there's some successes with education programs and enforcement has its place; but I tend to feel that there are better uses of resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only two years ago, I was an ardent believer in that motorists were to blame for everything: speeding, running red lights, and driving themselves off the road.  Since then, however, I&#8217;ve become more convinced that we &#8212; transportation engineers and politics &#8212; have all inadvertently conspired to be the cause of such behavior.  I no longer believe people want to break the law; we just encourage them to do so.</p>
<p>If a road is designed such that a user can comfortably drive 50 MPH and we post it 30&#8230; of course there will be speeding.  If we have a straightaway whereby users could drive 200 MPH and then we throw in a 15 MPH curve&#8230; signing doesn&#8217;t cut it; the speed needs to be reduced geometrically.  Every problem, with adequate resources, can be mitigated through design.</p>
<p>Education &amp; enforcement vs. engineering; protection &amp; warning vs. hazard removal&#8230; so much will &amp; resources are spent on band-aid treatments.  Granted, there&#8217;s some successes with education programs and enforcement has its place; but I tend to feel that there are better uses of resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

