<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mapping Traffic Laws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/24/mapping-traffic-laws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/24/mapping-traffic-laws/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 19:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sexify</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/24/mapping-traffic-laws/#comment-6741</link>
		<dc:creator>sexify</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=751#comment-6741</guid>
		<description>@ Nick

Good point. Considering the bicycle has been used as a vehicle for longer than the automobile, it'd be interesting to find out when and under what circumstances those states decided to strike bikes from their list of recognised 'vehicles'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Nick</p>
<p>Good point. Considering the bicycle has been used as a vehicle for longer than the automobile, it&#8217;d be interesting to find out when and under what circumstances those states decided to strike bikes from their list of recognised &#8216;vehicles&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/24/mapping-traffic-laws/#comment-6733</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=751#comment-6733</guid>
		<description>Strange they picked helmets as a starting point. If you look at bicycle laws in general they are a crazy quilt, starting with basic stuff like where to ride.  To wit: some states require cyclists to use the shoulder, some prohibit them from doing so, and some are silent on the practice.  Some states consider a bicycle a vehicle, but many consider it a "device."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange they picked helmets as a starting point. If you look at bicycle laws in general they are a crazy quilt, starting with basic stuff like where to ride.  To wit: some states require cyclists to use the shoulder, some prohibit them from doing so, and some are silent on the practice.  Some states consider a bicycle a vehicle, but many consider it a &#8220;device.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

