<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Passive Voice is Killing Me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: McD</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/#comment-10177</link>
		<dc:creator>McD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=766#comment-10177</guid>
		<description>Good article, but which did you mean .....

see http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000264.htm

Tortuous, Torturous, or Tortured?

Tortuous means "winding, crooked" or "tricky to handle."

Torturous means "causing torture" or "painful in a cruel way."

Tortured as an adjective means "receiving torture" or "pained."

    Examples: He had to take a tortuous route through the Alps.

    He survived the torturous existence of the concentration camp.

    The beggar gave a tortured look to the passers-by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, but which did you mean &#8230;..</p>
<p>see <a href="http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000264.htm" rel="nofollow">http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000264.htm</a></p>
<p>Tortuous, Torturous, or Tortured?</p>
<p>Tortuous means &#8220;winding, crooked&#8221; or &#8220;tricky to handle.&#8221;</p>
<p>Torturous means &#8220;causing torture&#8221; or &#8220;painful in a cruel way.&#8221;</p>
<p>Tortured as an adjective means &#8220;receiving torture&#8221; or &#8220;pained.&#8221;</p>
<p>    Examples: He had to take a tortuous route through the Alps.</p>
<p>    He survived the torturous existence of the concentration camp.</p>
<p>    The beggar gave a tortured look to the passers-by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurjen S.</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/#comment-9068</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurjen S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=766#comment-9068</guid>
		<description>I'd like to (belatedly) weigh in from the perspective of a gun owner. Despite the reputation as irresponsible yahoos that many of us have (and in a number of cases, that is not undeserved), you will find that anyone who uses the term "accidental" to refer to an unintentional discharge on a gun owners' forum will immediately be corrected: the term "accidental discharge" is warranted only if the discharge occurs to a mechanical malfunction of the firearm, and this is an extremely rare occurrence; the correct term is "negligent discharge" (or "ND" for short). Responsible gun owners know that guns don't just "go off"; they discharge because someone caused them to.

Despite being a troglodyte in his political views, the late Jeff Cooper did formulate the Four Rules of Gun Safety (you can Google them) which, if adhered to, should prevent all NDs. Moreover, an ND that results in injury to a person can only be achieved by violating at least two of the Four Rules: #2 "Do allow the muzzle to cover anything you are not willing to destroy" &#38; #3 "Keep your finger outside the trigger guard unless you are intentionally in the process of shooting" (the latter being the Massad Ayoob revised version). Even in the highly unlikely event of a firearm discharging due to a mechanical malfunction, personal injury can only result from the wielder failing to observe Rule #2.

It is entirely reasonable to insist, by the same token, that traffic accidents--especially involving motor vehicles--should, more correctly, be called "traffic negligences," as they almost invariably occur as a result of someone being insufficiently cautious and attentive to their surroundings.

Alan McHett makes some excellent points above, to which I'd like to add. I immigrated to the US seven years ago from the (urbanized) western Netherlands, where I'd relied almost entirely on foot, bicycle and public transport to get around. As Alan says, the US is highly car-dependent, not least because distances can be quite large. And because Americans are, to a very real extent, forced to spend so much time in their vehicles, they--make that "we" since I've been citizen for two years--are strongly inclined to try to "get stuff done" during that time, such as eating a meal, doing personal grooming, reading the paper and, of course, making phone calls. All these activities inevitably impair drivers' situational awareness, but (as Alan notes) because we overestimate our driving skills, we think we'll be okay. We have an annual death toll of 40,000+ that says this is not the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to (belatedly) weigh in from the perspective of a gun owner. Despite the reputation as irresponsible yahoos that many of us have (and in a number of cases, that is not undeserved), you will find that anyone who uses the term &#8220;accidental&#8221; to refer to an unintentional discharge on a gun owners&#8217; forum will immediately be corrected: the term &#8220;accidental discharge&#8221; is warranted only if the discharge occurs to a mechanical malfunction of the firearm, and this is an extremely rare occurrence; the correct term is &#8220;negligent discharge&#8221; (or &#8220;ND&#8221; for short). Responsible gun owners know that guns don&#8217;t just &#8220;go off&#8221;; they discharge because someone caused them to.</p>
<p>Despite being a troglodyte in his political views, the late Jeff Cooper did formulate the Four Rules of Gun Safety (you can Google them) which, if adhered to, should prevent all NDs. Moreover, an ND that results in injury to a person can only be achieved by violating at least two of the Four Rules: #2 &#8220;Do allow the muzzle to cover anything you are not willing to destroy&#8221; &amp; #3 &#8220;Keep your finger outside the trigger guard unless you are intentionally in the process of shooting&#8221; (the latter being the Massad Ayoob revised version). Even in the highly unlikely event of a firearm discharging due to a mechanical malfunction, personal injury can only result from the wielder failing to observe Rule #2.</p>
<p>It is entirely reasonable to insist, by the same token, that traffic accidents&#8211;especially involving motor vehicles&#8211;should, more correctly, be called &#8220;traffic negligences,&#8221; as they almost invariably occur as a result of someone being insufficiently cautious and attentive to their surroundings.</p>
<p>Alan McHett makes some excellent points above, to which I&#8217;d like to add. I immigrated to the US seven years ago from the (urbanized) western Netherlands, where I&#8217;d relied almost entirely on foot, bicycle and public transport to get around. As Alan says, the US is highly car-dependent, not least because distances can be quite large. And because Americans are, to a very real extent, forced to spend so much time in their vehicles, they&#8211;make that &#8220;we&#8221; since I&#8217;ve been citizen for two years&#8211;are strongly inclined to try to &#8220;get stuff done&#8221; during that time, such as eating a meal, doing personal grooming, reading the paper and, of course, making phone calls. All these activities inevitably impair drivers&#8217; situational awareness, but (as Alan notes) because we overestimate our driving skills, we think we&#8217;ll be okay. We have an annual death toll of 40,000+ that says this is not the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick barber</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/#comment-6847</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=766#comment-6847</guid>
		<description>I am relieved to find that I am not the only one who sees a parallel between the blame-the-victim way that our culture treats/treated female rape victims, and the way we treat bicycle-riding victims of traffic collisions. The masculine/feminine parallels go deeper than the crash scenes, too, in the way that bicycle users are regarded on the road  compared to their automobile-driving counterparts. Sometimes I think of it as "cars are from Mars, bikes are from Venus." I wonder if there's a book in that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am relieved to find that I am not the only one who sees a parallel between the blame-the-victim way that our culture treats/treated female rape victims, and the way we treat bicycle-riding victims of traffic collisions. The masculine/feminine parallels go deeper than the crash scenes, too, in the way that bicycle users are regarded on the road  compared to their automobile-driving counterparts. Sometimes I think of it as &#8220;cars are from Mars, bikes are from Venus.&#8221; I wonder if there&#8217;s a book in that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PollyTeek</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/#comment-6765</link>
		<dc:creator>PollyTeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=766#comment-6765</guid>
		<description>The folks over at Streetsblog have been discussing this lack of accountability; they want the next NYC D.A. to take the carnage seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The folks over at Streetsblog have been discussing this lack of accountability; they want the next NYC D.A. to take the carnage seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j. gunn</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/#comment-6755</link>
		<dc:creator>j. gunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=766#comment-6755</guid>
		<description>i'm afraid i don't have anything to add here, i just wish to say.. i enjoyed this article very much, and i am still processing it's possible ramifications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m afraid i don&#8217;t have anything to add here, i just wish to say.. i enjoyed this article very much, and i am still processing it&#8217;s possible ramifications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geografree</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/#comment-6753</link>
		<dc:creator>geografree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=766#comment-6753</guid>
		<description>This is a public health video in heavy rotation currently in New Zealand. The title is "Intersections can be deadly". 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldIAgOzTLtw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a public health video in heavy rotation currently in New Zealand. The title is &#8220;Intersections can be deadly&#8221;. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldIAgOzTLtw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldIAgOzTLtw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yokota Fritz</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/#comment-6752</link>
		<dc:creator>Yokota Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=766#comment-6752</guid>
		<description>Cycling lawyer Bob Mionske &lt;a href="http://www.velonews.com/article/73458" rel="nofollow"&gt;often talks about the media bias&lt;/a&gt; against cyclists in crash reporting.  Last year in my area a sheriff's deputy fell asleep at the wheel of his car, drifted over the centerline and struck three cyclists riding single file in a bike lane. 

The most egregiously bad reporting came from the San Jose Mercury News: "The group collided with the deputy’s car," before describing the hazards of cyclists running lights, riding 2 abreast, and other 'crazy' cyclists behavior. This is in an article describing an incident in which the cyclists were riding lawfully on a normally safe, bike laned road.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cycling lawyer Bob Mionske <a href="http://www.velonews.com/article/73458" rel="nofollow">often talks about the media bias</a> against cyclists in crash reporting.  Last year in my area a sheriff&#8217;s deputy fell asleep at the wheel of his car, drifted over the centerline and struck three cyclists riding single file in a bike lane. </p>
<p>The most egregiously bad reporting came from the San Jose Mercury News: &#8220;The group collided with the deputy’s car,&#8221; before describing the hazards of cyclists running lights, riding 2 abreast, and other &#8216;crazy&#8217; cyclists behavior. This is in an article describing an incident in which the cyclists were riding lawfully on a normally safe, bike laned road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/#comment-6748</link>
		<dc:creator>jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=766#comment-6748</guid>
		<description>The print media is an important supporter of the cabal trying to put a positive spin on the car culture. You think the need for ad revenues may lead to perspective problems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The print media is an important supporter of the cabal trying to put a positive spin on the car culture. You think the need for ad revenues may lead to perspective problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan MacHett</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/#comment-6744</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan MacHett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=766#comment-6744</guid>
		<description>I am studying urban and regional planning. Several of my courses have covered the history of the automobile culture in the United States. I would posit that (1)as stated in your book, drivers perceive themselves as better drivers than they actually are, and (2)journalists accept and repeat that perspective in their stories about "accidents"; (3)because, as an auto-dependent culture, we cannot suffer to have that culture disparaged in any way -- better to claim that "accidents" are unavoidable acts of fate rather than admit that certain elements of the system have flaws, thereby inviting scrutiny of the system and the subsequent changes to fix those flaws (I speak of more than just drunk drivers here).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am studying urban and regional planning. Several of my courses have covered the history of the automobile culture in the United States. I would posit that (1)as stated in your book, drivers perceive themselves as better drivers than they actually are, and (2)journalists accept and repeat that perspective in their stories about &#8220;accidents&#8221;; (3)because, as an auto-dependent culture, we cannot suffer to have that culture disparaged in any way &#8212; better to claim that &#8220;accidents&#8221; are unavoidable acts of fate rather than admit that certain elements of the system have flaws, thereby inviting scrutiny of the system and the subsequent changes to fix those flaws (I speak of more than just drunk drivers here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Toews</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/03/28/the-passive-voice-is-killing-me/#comment-6743</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Toews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=766#comment-6743</guid>
		<description>A friend of a friend, who has been a guest in Her Majesty’s prisons in Canada a number of times, told me that you never ask a fellow convict what they did.  Instead you ask “What were you convicted of?”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of a friend, who has been a guest in Her Majesty’s prisons in Canada a number of times, told me that you never ask a fellow convict what they did.  Instead you ask “What were you convicted of?”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
