<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The High Risk of &#8220;Low&#8221; Speed Roads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/04/20/the-high-risk-of-low-speed-roads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/04/20/the-high-risk-of-low-speed-roads/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:27:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/04/20/the-high-risk-of-low-speed-roads/#comment-6999</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=807#comment-6999</guid>
		<description>Not so sure about speed upping the fatality rate.  I mean, seriously, what percentage of driving is done below 55mph on the interstate.  It seems, just like the economy, slow kills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so sure about speed upping the fatality rate.  I mean, seriously, what percentage of driving is done below 55mph on the interstate.  It seems, just like the economy, slow kills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Horner</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/04/20/the-high-risk-of-low-speed-roads/#comment-6987</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Horner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=807#comment-6987</guid>
		<description>Using Bob's numbers, don't we get 0.037 fatalities per mile on interstates and 0.002 fatalities per mile on non-interstates?  That leads to the opposite conclusion.

I wouldn't be surprised if we found lower accident rates on interstates; but when you do get an accident there, ya die!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using Bob&#8217;s numbers, don&#8217;t we get 0.037 fatalities per mile on interstates and 0.002 fatalities per mile on non-interstates?  That leads to the opposite conclusion.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if we found lower accident rates on interstates; but when you do get an accident there, ya die!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Bigboote</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/04/20/the-high-risk-of-low-speed-roads/#comment-6974</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Bigboote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=807#comment-6974</guid>
		<description>Federal Highway Adminstration states there are a total of 4 million miles of roads in the U.S. with only 47,000 of them being Interstate. From a law enforcement perspective, the interstates are a better use of resources to reduce the fatality rate.

To make a significant impact on the remainder of the roads would require a massive increase in law enforcement resources to achieve reasonable coverage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal Highway Adminstration states there are a total of 4 million miles of roads in the U.S. with only 47,000 of them being Interstate. From a law enforcement perspective, the interstates are a better use of resources to reduce the fatality rate.</p>
<p>To make a significant impact on the remainder of the roads would require a massive increase in law enforcement resources to achieve reasonable coverage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Vanderbilt</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/04/20/the-high-risk-of-low-speed-roads/#comment-6963</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Vanderbilt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=807#comment-6963</guid>
		<description>These are both valid points. I suppose my interest was less about the exposure rate per se than in the qualitative aspect; i.e., that these low speed, presumably safer roads are home to such a large portion of the fatalities related to speeding (which makes me wonder if enforcement efforts shouldn't be shifted a bit towards these roads, away from Interstate highways and the like).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are both valid points. I suppose my interest was less about the exposure rate per se than in the qualitative aspect; i.e., that these low speed, presumably safer roads are home to such a large portion of the fatalities related to speeding (which makes me wonder if enforcement efforts shouldn&#8217;t be shifted a bit towards these roads, away from Interstate highways and the like).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acline</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/04/20/the-high-risk-of-low-speed-roads/#comment-6962</link>
		<dc:creator>acline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=807#comment-6962</guid>
		<description>From no more information than what's in this chart, my first thought is that the results make sense. Speeding in low-speed environments is probably the same as speeding in complex environments, i.e. roads with a lot of cross traffic, driveway entrances, sidewalks, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From no more information than what&#8217;s in this chart, my first thought is that the results make sense. Speeding in low-speed environments is probably the same as speeding in complex environments, i.e. roads with a lot of cross traffic, driveway entrances, sidewalks, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Horner</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2009/04/20/the-high-risk-of-low-speed-roads/#comment-6959</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Horner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=807#comment-6959</guid>
		<description>I'd check into the rate of fatality for each facility.  If 29% of all traffic is on low speed non-interstates, than 29% if all fatalities is perhaps not so high of a number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d check into the rate of fatality for each facility.  If 29% of all traffic is on low speed non-interstates, than 29% if all fatalities is perhaps not so high of a number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

