CONTACTTRAFFICABOUT TOM VANDERBILTOTHER WRITING CONTACT ABOUT THE BOOK

Silent Majority on Red-Light Cameras?

Via online only Seattle Pi.com comes an interesting tale of tentative success with red-light cameras.

This bit stood out:

A random telephone survey of 400 people last August showed an 85 percent approval rate, Quinn said. And city officials continue to get unsolicited recommendations for intersections to install new cameras.

I don’t know the specifics of that survey, but given that nary a day goes by that I don’t hear the old charges about cameras “increasing accidents” — without identifying the much more serious crashes that same cameras have reduced — and being simple revenue-raising tools for municipalities, I was surprised by the high level of seeming support.

Or maybe it’s a Seattle thing (I once received a jaywalking warning there by an officer in blue).

[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Yahoo!]

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 11th, 2009 at 5:48 pm and is filed under Traffic Engineering, Traffic Gadgets, Traffic safety. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “Silent Majority on Red-Light Cameras?”

  1. Vincent Clement Says:

    How was the survey worded? Something like “Red light cameras will reduce accidents are intersections. Do you support red light cameras?” is a wee-bit loaded.

  2. chrismealy Says:

    Isn’t there some deal where when they put them in they often shorten the yellow cycle to raise revenue?

  3. nathan_h Says:

    That’s the story. But it is worth conceptually separating traffic camera technology from the abuse of it by particular localities. Timings can be verified by the public, and excuses for shortening them are easily refuted. (People can not foresee a shorter yellow and drive differently before it expires.) Signs to indicate the presence of a camera would further enhance their positive effect. Demand actual safety from local governments and they can hardly refuse in the name of revenue.

  4. John Says:

    Nathan,

    If anyone is designing a sign for these, how about just CAM hanging right below the light? This is where we need to look and everyone knows the abbreviated meaning. In fact, there could be fake ones that would work this way.

  5. ScottF Says:

    Where I live in Missouri, they do have signs on the traffic lights if the red lights are camera enforced. I forget the exact wording but it is something like “RED LIGHT CAMERA ENFORCED” in quite large letters.

Leave a Reply

Traffic Tom Vanderbilt

How We Drive is the companion blog to Tom Vanderbilt’s New York Times bestselling book, Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says About Us), published by Alfred A. Knopf in the U.S. and Canada, Penguin in the U.K, and in languages other than English by a number of other fine publishers worldwide.

Please send tips, news, research papers, links, photos (bad road signs, outrageous bumper stickers, spectacularly awful acts of driving or parking or anything traffic-related), or ideas for my Slate.com Transport column to me at: info@howwedrive.com.

For publicity inquiries, please contact Kate Runde at Vintage: krunde@randomhouse.com.

For editorial inquiries, please contact Zoe Pagnamenta at The Zoe Pagnamenta Agency: zoe@zpagency.com.

For speaking engagement inquiries, please contact Victoria Gerken at the Knopf Speaker Bureau.

Order Traffic from:

Amazon | B&N | Borders
Random House | Powell’s

[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Yahoo!]
U.S. Paperback UK Paperback
Traffic UK
Drive-on-the-left types can order the book from Amazon.co.uk.

For UK publicity enquiries please contact Rosie Glaisher at Penguin.

Upcoming Talks

[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Yahoo!]
August 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31