April 9, 2008.
California Office of Traffic Safety Summit
San Francisco, CA.
May 19, 2009
University of Minnesota Center for Transportation Studies
Bloomington, MN
June 23, 2009
Driving Assessment 2009
Big Sky, Montana
June 26, 2009
PRI World Congress
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
June 27, 2009
Day of Architecture
Utrecht, The Netherlands
July 13, 2009
Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals (ATSIP)
Phoenix, AZ.
August 12-14
Texas Department of Transportation “Save a Life Summit”
San Antonio, Texas
September 2, 2009
Governors Highway Safety Association Annual Meeting
Savannah, Georgia
September 11, 2009
Oregon Transportation Summit
Portland, Oregon
October 8
Honda R&D Americas
Raymond, Ohio
October 10-11
INFORMS Roundtable
San Diego, CA
October 21, 2009
California State University-San Bernardino, Leonard Transportation Center
San Bernardino, CA
November 5
Southern New England Planning Association Planning Conference
Uncasville, Connecticut
January 6
Texas Transportation Forum
Austin, TX
January 19
Yale University
(with Donald Shoup; details to come)
Monday, February 22
Yale University School of Architecture
Eero Saarinen Lecture
Friday, March 19
University of Delaware
Delaware Center for Transportation
April 5-7
University of Utah
Salt Lake City
McMurrin Lectureship
April 19
International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (Organization Management Workshop)
Austin, Texas
Monday, April 26
Edmonton Traffic Safety Conference
Edmonton, Canada
Monday, June 7
Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals
Niagara Falls, Ontario
Wednesday, July 6
Fondo de Prevención Vial
Bogotá, Colombia
Tuesday, August 31
Royal Automobile Club
Perth, Australia
Wednesday, September 1
Australasian Road Safety Conference
Canberra, Australia
Wednesday, September 22
Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s
Traffic Incident Management Enhancement Program
Statewide Conference
Wisconsin Dells, WI
Wednesday, October 20
Rutgers University
Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation
Piscataway, NJ
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Ontario Injury Prevention Resource Centre
Injury Prevention Forum
Toronto
Monday, May 2
Idaho Public Driver Education Conference
Boise, Idaho
Tuesday, June 2, 2011
California Association of Cities
Costa Mesa, California
Sunday, August 21, 2011
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Attitudes: Iniciativa Social de Audi
Madrid, Spain
April 16, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Gardens Theatre, QUT
Brisbane, Australia
April 17, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Centennial Plaza, Sydney
Sydney, Australia
April 19, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Melbourne Town Hall
Melbourne, Australia
January 30, 2013
University of Minnesota City Engineers Association Meeting
Minneapolis, MN
January 31, 2013
Metropolis and Mobile Life
School of Architecture, University of Toronto
February 22, 2013
ISL Engineering
Edmonton, Canada
March 1, 2013
Australian Road Summit
Melbourne, Australia
August 29th, 2009 at 9:51 am
I don’t see why those areas couldn’t be filled in & landscaped… the article itself notes that they’re just being tested, so if the transportation agency decides to keep them: I’d expect they’ll probably improve upon aesthetics.
August 29th, 2009 at 12:53 pm
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
If it is cheap simple and it works. Go for it.
Read a comment from the article.
“PCRider Jul-29 @ 2:45 PM Take a trip to Sedona using the 179 over from the I-17. Traffic was bad before they built the roundabouts, now it’s just ridiculous.”
You never hear from others who live and use the roundabouts on a daily basis. Just those who can’t handle driving in a circle at low speeds and looking out for others.
August 29th, 2009 at 4:31 pm
Interesting comment, George. It makes me think that drivers might be upset that some responsibility for their actions are being placed back in their hands.
August 29th, 2009 at 7:46 pm
Some people will probably oppose the permanent roundabout just because the temps were ugly. They could at least thrown in some potted plants!
August 31st, 2009 at 5:41 am
Cheap, effective and easy to put in place. So no tax money wasted.
August 31st, 2009 at 1:00 pm
The purpose of a traffic circle should be to speed things up, not slow them down. Bad idea.
Tryin’ to fix what ain’t broken. No wonder the economy is in the shitter.
September 9th, 2009 at 2:13 pm
Unfortunately the article confuses a “traffic circle” with a “modern roundabout”.
And aaron, once again, thinks speed is the ultimate goal, ignoring safety. How fast do you want people driving through your neighborhood?
It sounds like these modern roundabouts exist simply to slow down traffic. But those used and heavily used intersections have been found to have the effect of both slowing traffic down and getting people to their destination faster by lowering the odds that someone will have to come to a complete stop and idle waiting for their turn.