Road Tautology

(thanks Dan Pink)

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 19th, 2009 at 10:33 am and is filed under Traffic Signs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

12 Responses to “Road Tautology”

  1. Paul Johnson Says:

    I wish USDOT would change the local bike route sign already. Most cities that employ this style of sign do not distribute a bicycle map that shows these routes highlighted, such as the one shown at

    My only problem with Oregon’s bicycle guidance signs like the one above, is they’re using a font size that’s two too small to be legiable by approaching cyclists without slowing down. Get stuck in a platoon of cyclists with someone towards the front trying to read the sign, and suddenly the next adjacent lane is full of cyclists who do know where they’re going trying to pass.

  2. njkayaker Says:

    As far as I can tell, the “bike route” signs are largely inexplicable.

  3. doug Says:

    Are they really inexplicable? It seems clear to me that the bike route comes in from the left and then turns to go straight, from the perspective of the the cyclist reading this sign. Thus, one could go straight or turn left and be on the “Bike Route”. Right?

  4. bikermark Says:

    There should be neighborhood roundabouts not 4 way STOPs on bike routes.

  5. Jack Says:

    These bike route signs are a waste of space, public dollars and almost as silly as “stop means stop”. Limiting the “advised” routes is just another way the car culture dictates the rights of cyclists.

  6. wes kirkman Says:

    Is the stop means stop sign meant for the cyclist?

    I agree: bike route signs are worthless. Bike routes adopted by jurisdictions, however, are not. In theory, an adopted bike route would mean this is the best route for cyclists to take given existing destinations, environmental factors such as topography, and infrastructure. Unfortunately, the AASHTO/MUTCD Engineers slap some signs on the routes and call it a day, rather than actually putting in infrastructure improvements.

    A sign dost not make a pleasurable/safe bike route…

  7. townmouse Says:

    @Bikermark – Coming from the land of roundabouts (the UK), I’m not sure they’re any better on a bike route than a four way stop. Little roundabouts are fine, but big ones are quite complicated for a bike to negotiate and pretty much all of my near miss/SMIDSY experiences on my bike have been on roundabouts.

  8. DoctorJay Says:

    Are there places where “stop” doesn’t mean “stop”? Most people I see who don’t stop at stop signs aren’t mistaken about what it means. They just don’t give a damn.

  9. fred_dot_u Says:

    red traffic lights don’t seem to mean much either.

    I recorded this from my helmet camera while on my self-balancing unicycle on an errand. no stopping before turning right on red, blocking the crosswalk, running a red light (2 cars), and it was the same intersection in an out-and-back trip.

  10. Richard C. Moeur Says:

    I’ll have to agree that the standard D11-1 BIKE ROUTE sign is rather “content-deprived” – especially in the way it’s typically installed & used.

    Fortunately, there are improved signs coming very soon* that provide useful guidance – in fact, some cities are already installing these.

    Take a look at Section 9B-20 & Figure 9B-4 at:

    *FHWA has indicated that a new edition of the MUTCD (containing these signs) will be coming out around the beginning of 2010 – either that, or it’ll go back for another round of public comment. We’ll find out in the next month or so.

  11. j Says:

    These bike route signs (at least as I’ve seen them deployed) are useless, if you’re riding a bike, trying to follow them. Of course, I do live in New Jersey, where signage is horrible anyway. This is also true, though, in New York State, where signage (for cars) is generally pretty good. I think states, counties, and local municipalities must get grants to put them up (or they’re required to, under the terms of funding they receive), so they put them up, but without any serious attempt to make them meaningful.

  12. j Says:

    [after looking at the signage pdf]

    Great, for jurisdictions that observe such standards. New Jersey is not such a place.

Leave a Reply

Traffic Tom Vanderbilt

How We Drive is the companion blog to Tom Vanderbilt’s New York Times bestselling book, Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says About Us), published by Alfred A. Knopf in the U.S. and Canada, Penguin in the U.K, and in languages other than English by a number of other fine publishers worldwide.

Please send tips, news, research papers, links, photos (bad road signs, outrageous bumper stickers, spectacularly awful acts of driving or parking or anything traffic-related), or ideas for my Transport column to me at:

For publicity inquiries, please contact Kate Runde at Vintage:

For editorial inquiries, please contact Zoe Pagnamenta at The Zoe Pagnamenta Agency:

For speaking engagement inquiries, please contact
Kim Thornton at the Random House Speakers Bureau:

Order Traffic from:

Amazon | B&N | Borders
Random House | Powell’s

U.S. Paperback UK Paperback
Traffic UK
Drive-on-the-left types can order the book from

For UK publicity enquiries please contact Rosie Glaisher at Penguin.

Upcoming Talks

April 9, 2008.
California Office of Traffic Safety Summit
San Francisco, CA.

May 19, 2009
University of Minnesota Center for Transportation Studies
Bloomington, MN

June 23, 2009
Driving Assessment 2009
Big Sky, Montana

June 26, 2009
PRI World Congress
Rotterdam, The Netherlands

June 27, 2009
Day of Architecture
Utrecht, The Netherlands

July 13, 2009
Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals (ATSIP)
Phoenix, AZ.

August 12-14
Texas Department of Transportation “Save a Life Summit”
San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2009
Governors Highway Safety Association Annual Meeting
Savannah, Georgia

September 11, 2009
Oregon Transportation Summit
Portland, Oregon

October 8
Honda R&D Americas
Raymond, Ohio

October 10-11
INFORMS Roundtable
San Diego, CA

October 21, 2009
California State University-San Bernardino, Leonard Transportation Center
San Bernardino, CA

November 5
Southern New England Planning Association Planning Conference
Uncasville, Connecticut

January 6
Texas Transportation Forum
Austin, TX

January 19
Yale University
(with Donald Shoup; details to come)

Monday, February 22
Yale University School of Architecture
Eero Saarinen Lecture

Friday, March 19
University of Delaware
Delaware Center for Transportation

April 5-7
University of Utah
Salt Lake City
McMurrin Lectureship

April 19
International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (Organization Management Workshop)
Austin, Texas

Monday, April 26
Edmonton Traffic Safety Conference
Edmonton, Canada

Monday, June 7
Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals
Niagara Falls, Ontario

Wednesday, July 6
Fondo de Prevención Vial
Bogotá, Colombia

Tuesday, August 31
Royal Automobile Club
Perth, Australia

Wednesday, September 1
Australasian Road Safety Conference
Canberra, Australia

Wednesday, September 22

Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s
Traffic Incident Management Enhancement Program
Statewide Conference
Wisconsin Dells, WI

Wednesday, October 20
Rutgers University
Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation
Piscataway, NJ

Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Ontario Injury Prevention Resource Centre
Injury Prevention Forum

Monday, May 2
Idaho Public Driver Education Conference
Boise, Idaho

Tuesday, June 2, 2011
California Association of Cities
Costa Mesa, California

Sunday, August 21, 2011
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Attitudes: Iniciativa Social de Audi
Madrid, Spain

April 16, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Gardens Theatre, QUT
Brisbane, Australia

April 17, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Centennial Plaza, Sydney
Sydney, Australia

April 19, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Melbourne Town Hall
Melbourne, Australia

January 30, 2013
University of Minnesota City Engineers Association Meeting
Minneapolis, MN

January 31, 2013
Metropolis and Mobile Life
School of Architecture, University of Toronto

February 22, 2013
ISL Engineering
Edmonton, Canada

March 1, 2013
Australian Road Summit
Melbourne, Australia

May 8, 2013
New York State Association of
Transportation Engineers
Rochester, NY

August 18, 2013 “Ingenuity” Conference
San Francisco, CA

September 26, 2013
TransComm 2013
(Meeting of American Association
of State Highway and Transportation
Officials’ Subcommittee on Transportation
Grand Rapids MI



November 2009
« Oct   Dec »

No, you probably won be compensated one million dollars; however, with the right blend of negotiating skills and patience, your efforts will be substantially rewarded!I have seen up to forty thousand dollars added to starting compensation through diligent negotiations. It is a way to significantly raise your standard of living and sense of self, simply by