ESC and Driver Adaptation

NHTSA has predicted that electronic stability control “would save 5,300 to 9,600 lives and prevent 156,000 to 238,000 injuries in all types of crashes annually once all light vehicles on the road are equipped with ESC.”

This article brings up a few of the reasons why that estimate — as with previous technological interventions — might be high (even if there is still a net safety gain). One of the operative questions is how aware people are of the presence of ESC, and whether they can actually feel its effects, and what new problems owing to unintended consequences might arise.

But not everyone sees stability control as a cure-all that will prevent all road crashes.

Independent stability control development specialist Graeme Gambold says that while he supports the rolling out of the system, there are drawbacks. One is the dumbing down of drivers who increasingly are relying on technology to get them out of fixes.

“With the new regulation calling for every car to be equipped with [stability control], I worry that skill deprivation is not an issue in the minds of governments,” Gambold says. “Yet this is the great killer on our roads. You’ve still got to be smart and still need a high level of skill to drive a motor car but authorities seem to think that there is a technological fix for the road toll.”

Gambold says stability control is only as good as a vehicle’s grip on the road. “It’s not as effective on more slippery surfaces such as ice, snow and on gravel,” he says. “Any number of environmental factors – crowned roads, potholes and broken road edges – can reduce its effectiveness.”

Another shortfall of stability control systems is that they will only try to control the car in the direction of your steering command.

“Turning the wheel into the slide can tell the system its task has finished and it may cease its assistance,” Gambold says.

This entry was posted on Monday, November 23rd, 2009 at 9:17 am and is filed under Traffic safety. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “ESC and Driver Adaptation”

  1. Jeffrey Early Says:

    The point about drivers increasingly relying on technology to get them out of fixes is well taken. A great example of this is people’s reliance on their brakes. In modern cars, people are perfectly happy to go flying right up to a stop sign and then stomp on the brakes at the last second. This is bad for a number of reasons, but almost always works because brakes are so fantastic these days. Now go try that with cars from the mid 1980s or earlier, and you’ll find you need much more distance (and effort) to stop.

    That said, I still agree with the general conclusion that technology fixes like this will save lives, but that the estimates may be high.

  2. John Says:

    Because the default will always be driver control, perhaps Mr. Vanderbilt will comment on the line of writing I use in “Best Driver In The World.” My reasoning could be used in a 1957 Cadillac or a 2009 Acura.

    A car that drives itself takes away an important freedom and will not be that accepted.

  3. Scott Says:

    I’m not sure I completely agree with John. Based on the number of cars that are sold with automatic transmissions and ABS brakes, I’d say drivers aren’t completely concerned about their freedoms being taken away.

    Personally, I think this “dumbing down” of driving is actually worse for safety. The prevelance of automatic features leads drivers to think they can pay less attention to driving and more attention to eating, texting, shaving, etc. Just think how many people would be able to eat and drive if we didn’t have automatic transmissions.

    I’m not a psychologist, but there’s also a relationship between perceived risk and dangerous behavior. If you’ve got airbags, traction control, stability control, and everything else then why bother to drive more carefully? Have you ever noticed that most of the vehicles off the road in the winter are 4WD/AWD? Drivers don’t think they need to slow down when it’s slippery because they have the “safety of 4WD/AWD”.

  4. John Says:

    It’s important and interesting to mention automatic transmissions– I wouldn’t want to be without one.

  5. clever-title Says:

    This isn’t all that surprising. For years (especially since Freakonomics was published) economists have been talking about drivers acting in more risky ways when technology reduces the impact of the risk. Since seat belts, airbags, crumple zones, and the like don’t reduce the impact to pedestrians, cyclists, telephone poles, the roads are less safe to non-drivers.

    If you really wanted drivers to act more responsibly, you would include technology that internalizes the risk to the driver, like a kitchen knife mounted to the steering wheel pointed at the driver’s heart.

  6. fred_dot_u Says:

    It’s great to see someone who recognizes that making the driver feel safe does not mean that it’s safe for everyone!

    Put the driver in a bubble at the very front of the vehicle, put all drivers at the front, and see how much care is taken when driving!

Leave a Reply

Traffic Tom Vanderbilt

How We Drive is the companion blog to Tom Vanderbilt’s New York Times bestselling book, Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says About Us), published by Alfred A. Knopf in the U.S. and Canada, Penguin in the U.K, and in languages other than English by a number of other fine publishers worldwide.

Please send tips, news, research papers, links, photos (bad road signs, outrageous bumper stickers, spectacularly awful acts of driving or parking or anything traffic-related), or ideas for my Transport column to me at:

For publicity inquiries, please contact Kate Runde at Vintage:

For editorial inquiries, please contact Zoe Pagnamenta at The Zoe Pagnamenta Agency:

For speaking engagement inquiries, please contact
Kim Thornton at the Random House Speakers Bureau:

Order Traffic from:

Amazon | B&N | Borders
Random House | Powell’s

U.S. Paperback UK Paperback
Traffic UK
Drive-on-the-left types can order the book from

For UK publicity enquiries please contact Rosie Glaisher at Penguin.

Upcoming Talks

April 9, 2008.
California Office of Traffic Safety Summit
San Francisco, CA.

May 19, 2009
University of Minnesota Center for Transportation Studies
Bloomington, MN

June 23, 2009
Driving Assessment 2009
Big Sky, Montana

June 26, 2009
PRI World Congress
Rotterdam, The Netherlands

June 27, 2009
Day of Architecture
Utrecht, The Netherlands

July 13, 2009
Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals (ATSIP)
Phoenix, AZ.

August 12-14
Texas Department of Transportation “Save a Life Summit”
San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2009
Governors Highway Safety Association Annual Meeting
Savannah, Georgia

September 11, 2009
Oregon Transportation Summit
Portland, Oregon

October 8
Honda R&D Americas
Raymond, Ohio

October 10-11
INFORMS Roundtable
San Diego, CA

October 21, 2009
California State University-San Bernardino, Leonard Transportation Center
San Bernardino, CA

November 5
Southern New England Planning Association Planning Conference
Uncasville, Connecticut

January 6
Texas Transportation Forum
Austin, TX

January 19
Yale University
(with Donald Shoup; details to come)

Monday, February 22
Yale University School of Architecture
Eero Saarinen Lecture

Friday, March 19
University of Delaware
Delaware Center for Transportation

April 5-7
University of Utah
Salt Lake City
McMurrin Lectureship

April 19
International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (Organization Management Workshop)
Austin, Texas

Monday, April 26
Edmonton Traffic Safety Conference
Edmonton, Canada

Monday, June 7
Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals
Niagara Falls, Ontario

Wednesday, July 6
Fondo de Prevención Vial
Bogotá, Colombia

Tuesday, August 31
Royal Automobile Club
Perth, Australia

Wednesday, September 1
Australasian Road Safety Conference
Canberra, Australia

Wednesday, September 22

Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s
Traffic Incident Management Enhancement Program
Statewide Conference
Wisconsin Dells, WI

Wednesday, October 20
Rutgers University
Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation
Piscataway, NJ

Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Ontario Injury Prevention Resource Centre
Injury Prevention Forum

Monday, May 2
Idaho Public Driver Education Conference
Boise, Idaho

Tuesday, June 2, 2011
California Association of Cities
Costa Mesa, California

Sunday, August 21, 2011
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Attitudes: Iniciativa Social de Audi
Madrid, Spain

April 16, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Gardens Theatre, QUT
Brisbane, Australia

April 17, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Centennial Plaza, Sydney
Sydney, Australia

April 19, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Melbourne Town Hall
Melbourne, Australia

January 30, 2013
University of Minnesota City Engineers Association Meeting
Minneapolis, MN

January 31, 2013
Metropolis and Mobile Life
School of Architecture, University of Toronto

February 22, 2013
ISL Engineering
Edmonton, Canada

March 1, 2013
Australian Road Summit
Melbourne, Australia

May 8, 2013
New York State Association of
Transportation Engineers
Rochester, NY

August 18, 2013 “Ingenuity” Conference
San Francisco, CA

September 26, 2013
TransComm 2013
(Meeting of American Association
of State Highway and Transportation
Officials’ Subcommittee on Transportation
Grand Rapids MI



November 2009
« Oct   Dec »

No, you probably won be compensated one million dollars; however, with the right blend of negotiating skills and patience, your efforts will be substantially rewarded!I have seen up to forty thousand dollars added to starting compensation through diligent negotiations. It is a way to significantly raise your standard of living and sense of self, simply by