Comments on: Visionary Highway Film of the Week

By: Jack McCullough

Jack McCullough — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 02:08:00 +0000

I have a couple of thoughts. The first is to wonder how anyone would have been naive to watch this thing and think it could ever depict a plausible future reality.

The second, though, is to think about how many of the ideas in the film have come to pass.
Rear-view video cameras–check
Dashboard displayed interactive maps–check
Programmed travel routes–check
People at work participating in conferences by “television”–check
Ever-expanding commuting distances (and times)–check.

We’re not there yet, and we pretty clearly never will be, but much of what we have now would have seemed like fantasy to us forty or fifty years ago.

By: Todd Scott

Todd Scott — Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:14:51 +0000

Perhaps one of the film’s biggest mistake is to assume significantly lower energy costs for construction, operation, and maintenance of these systems. That “atomic utopianism” call is spot on.

By: John

John — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:15:03 +0000

Jack–

here’s what I think went wrong.

Let’s say this film was made 50 years ago. As of 2009, the average posted speed has changed very little. Imagine if what they were showing, in all its glory, still only operated at limits of from 55 to 75 mph. We would not be satisfied. The film, throughout, uses the allusion of speed.

How to get to limits of 150 mph? Bottom line, just like the fabled Autobahn, driver ability. Mr. Vanderbilt should give some press to the intriguing book American Autobahn, if he has not yet.

By: Jack

Jack — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:03:39 +0000

Aren’t these fantasies still shown at every DOT Christmas party? Highway escalators, nonstop farm-to-market cargo carriers, never any traffic, and “no driving responsibilities”- - so what went wrong?

By: Alvin C.

Alvin C. — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:52:18 +0000

Can the bridgemaking machine (2:15) really support itself on an arch with only one abutment?

By: John

John — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:22:55 +0000

One of your most interesting postings. Would I love to be able to go X-country at 160 MPH on something like what they showed– in a car not a train. A good solid 20 hour drive could get one from New York to California.

Perhaps our density has betrayed this dream. Most of what they showed were “wide open spaces.”

By: Rich Wilson

Rich Wilson — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:41:48 +0000

Interesting how everyone remains so skinny while sitting on their ass in a car all day long.

By: Brian Weis

Brian Weis — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:28:20 +0000

The truck train seem like a halfway decent idea, freight trains that can separate and go to individual places. But with a lot of the concepts shown there… can you imagine how fat we would get? Riding around on moving sidewalks and only having to walk 10 feet to the desk at work… But my personal favorite from the video? “On entering the city, the family separates. Father to his office, Mother and Son to the shopping center.”