A Driving Problem, Not a Texting Problem

I’ve always thought that most people really do not like to drive, or at least drive all that much. Why would they otherwise be so constantly engaged in non-driving activities?

Clive Thompson makes this point in an interesting new column at Wired.

Texting while driving is, in essence, a wake-up call to America. It illustrates our real, and bigger, predicament: The country is currently better suited to cars than to communication. This is completely bonkers.

Thompson has an idea for a technological solution to the problem:

So what can we do? We should change our focus to the other side of the equation and curtail not the texting but the driving. This may sound a bit facetious, but I’m serious. When we worry about driving and texting, we assume that the most important thing the person is doing is piloting the car. But what if the most important thing they’re doing is texting? How do we free them up so they can text without needing to worry about driving?

The answer, of course, is public transit. In many parts of the world where texting has become ingrained in daily life — like Japan and Europe — public transit is so plentiful that there hasn’t been a major texting-while-driving crisis. You don’t endanger anyone’s life while quietly tapping out messages during your train ride to work in Tokyo or Berlin.

I don’t think it’s a stretch at all to say, for the current crop of young drivers, that texting — staying in electronic touch — is far more important than the act of driving. They also protest that they are uniquely well adapted to “handle” such behavior, overlooking the inconvenient fact that all the major studies of texting/cell-phone distraction have been conducted on college students, not at retirement homes.

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 25th, 2010 at 8:55 am and is filed under Commuting, Traffic safety. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

13 Responses to “A Driving Problem, Not a Texting Problem”

  1. Andrew L Says:

    Texting while walking is a hazard too. You live in NYC – just walk along a sidewalk in Manhattan.

  2. Bob Says:

    Last Saturday I was in a parking lot, getting stuff from the back seat of our old Volvo. The driver of a Toyota Sequoia next to me backed out, never looking to his left, or in front of him. He also didn’t even notice that his bumper bent the door of our Volvo around my leg, and only noticed this when my wife ran yelling at his vehicle. He never looked. His passengers never looked. He never felt the impact. He didn’t notice the resistance. I don’t think he was texting, I think he just wasn’t taking his responsibility for driving seriously.

  3. wes kirkman Says:

    Mer…the worst that happens is you bonk your head on a light pole. You texting while walking is a danger to you. You texting while driving is a danger to everyone else. Big difference.

  4. TomL Says:

    People multitask because they are so pressed for time, to accomplish more things in the same amount of time.

    So take away a chunk of their free time when they are caught driving while using a cellphone or texting. In addition to a nomimal monetary fine (less than $100), make them spend at least 8 hours doing community service.

    A full day picking up trash, sweeping streets or other mindless labor will cause people to think twice before using their personal electronic devices and trying to pilot a 3,000 lb on the highway.

  5. Nate A Says:

    I wish they would make texting while driving a primary offense in VA. Currently it’s a secondary offense, which I guess I should be glad that at least it’s against the law! I’m a police officer, and I’ve been trying to figure out a way to right someone a ticket for it. Not only do you have to prove they were texting and not dialing a phone number, you have to have another reason to stop them. Which makes enforcement of this law virtually impossible.

  6. Yuri Artibise Says:

    My solution for those who want to text while on the move, is to leave the keys at home and pick up a transit pass.

  7. Andy Says:

    Nate, why do you want this to be a primary offense? That is ridiculous. As a law enforcement officer, you need to quit worrying about things that MIGHT cause trouble, and instead worry about things that DO cause trouble. Someone driving incompetently, texting or not, should be stopped and ticketed. Someone driving competently, texting or not, should be left alone. You shouldn’t ever make a stop if you couldn’t make that same stop if the person had all tinted windows so that you couldn’t observe any irrelevant behavior internal to the vehicle.

  8. Josh R Says:

    Andy, anyone who is driving and texting is not driving competently, period, full stop, end of sentence. The driver’s attention is divided and they only have one hand on the wheel for extended periods of time, neither of which is a good thing for driving safety.

    The problem here is the differing definition of “Competent driving” Being able to keep your car in the same lane while going in a straight line is not “Competent” its a bare minimum level of skill expected of a student driver. What defines competent driving is your situational awareness and ability to react quickly to changing conditions. Somebody may be pretty good at keeping his car between the lines while texting, but I absolutely guarantee that if something happens ahead of him that requires action on his part, he will react more slowly and less competently then someone who has both hands on the wheel and is watching the road.

    Texting while driving should absolutely be a primary offense, because while texting YOU ARE NOT DRIVING. You are at best keeping your ton of metal & plastic between the lines, and that’s not good enough.

  9. njkayaker Says:

    Andy@7 “As a law enforcement officer, you need to quit worrying about things that MIGHT cause trouble, and instead worry about things that DO cause trouble”
    ?? There is at least one study that shows texting is more distracting that being drunk. Does that mean drunk driving should be legal? Anyway, the point is to avoid trouble (ie, collisions) before it occurs.

  10. aaron Says:

    We could also focus on mismanagement of traffic. I wouldn’t be surprised to find that most texting and cell phone use is induced by inadequate traffic flow.

  11. Vagabondblogger Says:

    I have a problem with people who have one hand to the ear talking on their mobiles, so texting while driving makes me nuts. Both take away your attention from the road. They should be offenses equal to driving while drunk or “under the influence”. But let me add this, most people who do those things to begin with, are probably bad drivers (or extremely rude people), who shouldn’t have a drivers license to begin with. I’m also in favor of testing older folks. I can’t say how many times I’ve almost been run down (as a pedestrian), or into (as a driver), by someone who is either not with it, or just doesn’t give a damn.

  12. froggyprager Says:

    I agree, the problem is not drunk driving, texting while driving, or talking on the phone while driving but that we drive too much. Perhaps if we put so many rules on driving, more people will think twice before taking a job, buying a house that requires lots of driving and consider a place there they can walk, bike, bus, etc. so they can have more time to safely do the things they want to do. Given the option I think most people would prefer to drive much less.

  13. Jason S. Says:

    What happens then? More ped crashes? I don’t know, its pretty hard to predict the unintended consequences of rules and regulations.

    The amount of time in a day has not changed. How we use that time has. What’s more important, telling your BFF that Jenny just looked at you funny, or being able to travel to your job…to support your family?

    Are we so self-centered that we can’t take a break from being stimulated for a few minutes so we can safely drive somewhere. The answer appears to be “Yes”. Humankind has done a pretty good job adapting to this planet. We rarely have to worry about simply surviving anymore so we have turned our attention in all different directions. I don’t think you can simply regulate this problem away because it appears to be only a symptom, or condition, of a larger topic. My overall point is that there are trade-offs. Do you want an extremely safe transportation system, or a pretty safe one and some sense of individualism and freedom. We actually do have a pretty safe system. Sure we can regulate it further, put a traffic cop and a firing squad at every mile marker, and execute everyone that doesn’t appear to be attentive…but who wants that kind of society, not me. We must continue to do what we can to reduce risks, but we need to have priorities and take the good along with the bad.

Leave a Reply

Traffic Tom Vanderbilt

How We Drive is the companion blog to Tom Vanderbilt’s New York Times bestselling book, Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says About Us), published by Alfred A. Knopf in the U.S. and Canada, Penguin in the U.K, and in languages other than English by a number of other fine publishers worldwide.

Please send tips, news, research papers, links, photos (bad road signs, outrageous bumper stickers, spectacularly awful acts of driving or parking or anything traffic-related), or ideas for my Transport column to me at:

For publicity inquiries, please contact Kate Runde at Vintage:

For editorial inquiries, please contact Zoe Pagnamenta at The Zoe Pagnamenta Agency:

For speaking engagement inquiries, please contact
Kim Thornton at the Random House Speakers Bureau:

Order Traffic from:

Amazon | B&N | Borders
Random House | Powell’s

U.S. Paperback UK Paperback
Traffic UK
Drive-on-the-left types can order the book from

For UK publicity enquiries please contact Rosie Glaisher at Penguin.

Upcoming Talks

April 9, 2008.
California Office of Traffic Safety Summit
San Francisco, CA.

May 19, 2009
University of Minnesota Center for Transportation Studies
Bloomington, MN

June 23, 2009
Driving Assessment 2009
Big Sky, Montana

June 26, 2009
PRI World Congress
Rotterdam, The Netherlands

June 27, 2009
Day of Architecture
Utrecht, The Netherlands

July 13, 2009
Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals (ATSIP)
Phoenix, AZ.

August 12-14
Texas Department of Transportation “Save a Life Summit”
San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2009
Governors Highway Safety Association Annual Meeting
Savannah, Georgia

September 11, 2009
Oregon Transportation Summit
Portland, Oregon

October 8
Honda R&D Americas
Raymond, Ohio

October 10-11
INFORMS Roundtable
San Diego, CA

October 21, 2009
California State University-San Bernardino, Leonard Transportation Center
San Bernardino, CA

November 5
Southern New England Planning Association Planning Conference
Uncasville, Connecticut

January 6
Texas Transportation Forum
Austin, TX

January 19
Yale University
(with Donald Shoup; details to come)

Monday, February 22
Yale University School of Architecture
Eero Saarinen Lecture

Friday, March 19
University of Delaware
Delaware Center for Transportation

April 5-7
University of Utah
Salt Lake City
McMurrin Lectureship

April 19
International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (Organization Management Workshop)
Austin, Texas

Monday, April 26
Edmonton Traffic Safety Conference
Edmonton, Canada

Monday, June 7
Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals
Niagara Falls, Ontario

Wednesday, July 6
Fondo de Prevención Vial
Bogotá, Colombia

Tuesday, August 31
Royal Automobile Club
Perth, Australia

Wednesday, September 1
Australasian Road Safety Conference
Canberra, Australia

Wednesday, September 22

Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s
Traffic Incident Management Enhancement Program
Statewide Conference
Wisconsin Dells, WI

Wednesday, October 20
Rutgers University
Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation
Piscataway, NJ

Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Ontario Injury Prevention Resource Centre
Injury Prevention Forum

Monday, May 2
Idaho Public Driver Education Conference
Boise, Idaho

Tuesday, June 2, 2011
California Association of Cities
Costa Mesa, California

Sunday, August 21, 2011
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Attitudes: Iniciativa Social de Audi
Madrid, Spain

April 16, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Gardens Theatre, QUT
Brisbane, Australia

April 17, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Centennial Plaza, Sydney
Sydney, Australia

April 19, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Melbourne Town Hall
Melbourne, Australia

January 30, 2013
University of Minnesota City Engineers Association Meeting
Minneapolis, MN

January 31, 2013
Metropolis and Mobile Life
School of Architecture, University of Toronto

February 22, 2013
ISL Engineering
Edmonton, Canada

March 1, 2013
Australian Road Summit
Melbourne, Australia

May 8, 2013
New York State Association of
Transportation Engineers
Rochester, NY

August 18, 2013 “Ingenuity” Conference
San Francisco, CA

September 26, 2013
TransComm 2013
(Meeting of American Association
of State Highway and Transportation
Officials’ Subcommittee on Transportation
Grand Rapids MI



February 2010
« Jan   Mar »

No, you probably won be compensated one million dollars; however, with the right blend of negotiating skills and patience, your efforts will be substantially rewarded!I have seen up to forty thousand dollars added to starting compensation through diligent negotiations. It is a way to significantly raise your standard of living and sense of self, simply by