<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Ramp All the Way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/03/17/a-ramp-all-the-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/03/17/a-ramp-all-the-way/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 13:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Warnock</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/03/17/a-ramp-all-the-way/#comment-11749</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Warnock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 05:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=1424#comment-11749</guid>
		<description>On networks like the Internet, data travels through switches. Before switches, we had hubs--data would collide and have to be resent.

Technology allows us to test models far faster and cheaper.  It makes sense that freeways systems should mimic optimised networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On networks like the Internet, data travels through switches. Before switches, we had hubs&#8211;data would collide and have to be resent.</p>
<p>Technology allows us to test models far faster and cheaper.  It makes sense that freeways systems should mimic optimised networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh R</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/03/17/a-ramp-all-the-way/#comment-11683</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=1424#comment-11683</guid>
		<description>I'm in the twin cities and remember when they did this test. Every blowhard on the local paper's website claimed that things were better without the metering, which only proves two things.

1. The plural of anecdote is not data.

2. People seem to prefer the illusion of progress, ie being stuck in slow &#38; go traffic, to actual progress, ie waiting for a bit to get on the freeway, then having a faster commute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the twin cities and remember when they did this test. Every blowhard on the local paper&#8217;s website claimed that things were better without the metering, which only proves two things.</p>
<p>1. The plural of anecdote is not data.</p>
<p>2. People seem to prefer the illusion of progress, ie being stuck in slow &amp; go traffic, to actual progress, ie waiting for a bit to get on the freeway, then having a faster commute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

