<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Key to Countering Turbulence: More Turbulence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/03/23/the-key-to-countering-turbulence-more-turbulence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/03/23/the-key-to-countering-turbulence-more-turbulence/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/03/23/the-key-to-countering-turbulence-more-turbulence/#comment-11970</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=1443#comment-11970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although pedestrian traffic is slightly different, I&#039;d expect the same as vehicular traffic or even worse, a stampede :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although pedestrian traffic is slightly different, I&#8217;d expect the same as vehicular traffic or even worse, a stampede <img src='http://www.howwedrive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandeep</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/03/23/the-key-to-countering-turbulence-more-turbulence/#comment-11968</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandeep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=1443#comment-11968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom, your blog has many interesting things and I keep reading it from time to time. 
About this post, the research on Dr. Hof says,
&quot;...it’s pushed along by smooth-flowing fluid behind it...&quot;
&quot;...Dr. Hof and his colleagues realized that introducing an eddy into this smooth-flowing zone would eliminate the turbulence in front of it...&quot;
Vehicular traffic flow is likened and sometimes modeled using some principles from gas flow. But the key difference is that traffic flow is anisotropic i.e. a vehicle does not respond to conditions behind it but only in front of it. Imagine a congested stretch of a roadway. Now if there is a free flowing traffic behind it, what would you expect ? The vehicles in the smooth will also enter the congested regime unlike a gas flow where the flow from behind pushes the gas in front of it.
Thanks for posting though :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, your blog has many interesting things and I keep reading it from time to time.<br />
About this post, the research on Dr. Hof says,<br />
&#8220;&#8230;it’s pushed along by smooth-flowing fluid behind it&#8230;&#8221;<br />
&#8220;&#8230;Dr. Hof and his colleagues realized that introducing an eddy into this smooth-flowing zone would eliminate the turbulence in front of it&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Vehicular traffic flow is likened and sometimes modeled using some principles from gas flow. But the key difference is that traffic flow is anisotropic i.e. a vehicle does not respond to conditions behind it but only in front of it. Imagine a congested stretch of a roadway. Now if there is a free flowing traffic behind it, what would you expect ? The vehicles in the smooth will also enter the congested regime unlike a gas flow where the flow from behind pushes the gas in front of it.<br />
Thanks for posting though <img src='http://www.howwedrive.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Chalkley</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/03/23/the-key-to-countering-turbulence-more-turbulence/#comment-11880</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Chalkley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=1443#comment-11880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tom, not completely on topic here but relevant to the issues you deal with... Have you read &#039;Death on the Streets&#039; by Robert Davis (isbn 0-948135-46-8)? A fascinating essay on how cars &amp; roads in the UK have contributed to a lot of the social and safety problems we now face. 

One of his central points is that the seat belt laws here have resulted in drivers &#039;risk-compensating&#039; by driving faster instead of safer. This results in no net safety benefit for car occupants and hugely increased risk to vulnerable road users.

I couldn&#039;t remember if you&#039;d mentioned his work in Traffic (I&#039;ve lent it to my neighbour - a local council traffic planner - so I can&#039;t check!). If you haven&#039;t read it - DO! It&#039;s an eye opener and poses the worrying point that if we don&#039;t do something drastic about cars like making them fully automatic, we will continue to suffer from the carnage and car-centricity we currently have on the roads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, not completely on topic here but relevant to the issues you deal with&#8230; Have you read &#8216;Death on the Streets&#8217; by Robert Davis (isbn 0-948135-46-8)? A fascinating essay on how cars &amp; roads in the UK have contributed to a lot of the social and safety problems we now face. </p>
<p>One of his central points is that the seat belt laws here have resulted in drivers &#8216;risk-compensating&#8217; by driving faster instead of safer. This results in no net safety benefit for car occupants and hugely increased risk to vulnerable road users.</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t remember if you&#8217;d mentioned his work in Traffic (I&#8217;ve lent it to my neighbour &#8211; a local council traffic planner &#8211; so I can&#8217;t check!). If you haven&#8217;t read it &#8211; DO! It&#8217;s an eye opener and poses the worrying point that if we don&#8217;t do something drastic about cars like making them fully automatic, we will continue to suffer from the carnage and car-centricity we currently have on the roads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
