CONTACTTRAFFICABOUT TOM VANDERBILTOTHER WRITING CONTACT ABOUT THE BOOK

Car Diapers

Caleb Crain waxes lyrical on a device I’ve found tends to draw blank stares from drivers in other parts of the country: Car diapers (or call them what you will: Coupe Condoms, Grille Guards, or by their actual monikers, Bumper Badgers, etc.)

Another thing I’ve long meant to blog about: car diapers. I wonder whether they exist outside Park Slope. In how many American neighborhoods do parallel parking, overprotectiveness, and automobile vanity co-exist? The car diaper is a large sheet of rubber that is draped over a car’s rear fender in order to protect it from the scratches and scrapes incidental to parallel parking. They aren’t called car diapers, of course, by their purveyors. Indeed they seem to have sort of self-consciously aggressive names, like “Bumper Bully” and “De-Fender.” But car diapers is what they look like. Some are attached by shutting them half in and half out of the trunk, so they flop over the fender, usually with a cut-out so that the license plate remains visible. A driver rarely scrapes up another car’s rear fender while parallel parking, because one always has a clear view of the other car’s rear fender. It’s one’s own rear fender that one scrapes, by misjudging the distance behind. So a car diaper is a responsible and civic thing to own—an admission of one’s incontinence as a driver, or anyway, as a parallel parker. Still.

I often wonder why (most) cars actually lost their extruding bumpers to begin with (look at those big rubber bricks on old Volvos) — some push for imagined aerodynamicism on the part of car drivers I suppose.

But Caleb’s post raises another issue that I’ve long wondered about: Do we need a special word to describe that curious metaphysical condition by which someone purchases a new consumer bauble that is so delightful, so gleaming and unscathed and yet so preciously fragile, that one must subsequently sheath it in protective covering — which often tries itself, a la iPhone, to be itself distinctive or wonderful but always fall short of the original, hidden object — that masks its unscathed delightfulness, which can then only be retrieved in rare fugitive moments when one has unstripped the protection, inhaling the original aura, but with each of these exposures bringing the risk of new blemishes, new forms of decay, that will itself make the process of unsheathing it (and resheathing it) that less special, until eventually the impulse to cover has been lost completely.

[the above image is Dominic Wilcox' 'anti-theft' stickers, which preemptively degrade the consumer object to lessen its value]

[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Yahoo!]

This entry was posted on Friday, April 9th, 2010 at 8:18 am and is filed under Traffic Culture. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

7 Responses to “Car Diapers”

  1. JamesR Says:

    The Bumper Bullies are pretty common in dense urban neighborhoods with overnight parking. I think the majority of the users buy them because they are leasing their cars and want to be able to avoid any surcharges for body damage at the end of the lease. They do look ridiculous, I’ll give you that. I’ve actually seen cars driving around the city with the contraption still exposed.

  2. Vin Says:

    Other places where those thing exist: Bay Ridge, Astoria, Flushing, Midwood, Jersey City….OK, yeah, they all seem to be in the NYC metro area.

    Somewhat more seriously, those things perplex me. They look a lot sillier than some scratches on a bumper, or even a minor dent. I’d say most cars on the road in NYC have some scratches and dings, especially on the bumper. Even on their own supposed merits, they don’t make sense.

  3. Opus the Poet Says:

    The reason cars no longer have bumpers that protrude from the side is the same reason they no longer have decent door handles, pedestrian safety. In spite of no known incidents of pedestrians getting caught and dragged by door handles, protruding bumpers, or wheel spinners, all of those were outlawed back in the 60s and 70s for new cars. Now I have to fight with the door every time I try to get in an unfamiliar car. And while they were messing with the door handles on the outside you think someone could have noticed that no 2 models of cars have their inside door release in the same place making panicked passengers have to search for a way to escape from a car in an emergency. I have literally had to run my hand over the inside of a car door searching for the door release, because it was the same color as the rest of the door panel and dark inside the car. Why doesn’t somebody do something about that if safety is such a big thing?

  4. Peter Smith Says:

    almost took a picture of one of these weird diaper things on a nice car in SF the other day. so bizarre.

  5. Tony Toews Says:

    “anti-theft’ stickers Ahh, now that’s why I haven’t washed my vehicles in over twenty years. Indeed after a drive in rain on the highway I find a gravel road just to get a layer of dirt on the vehicle.

    After all which is a thief going to smash the window to steal some stuff or the vehicle? My dirty POS (Piece of ****) or your shiny, clean vehicle?

    Also I simply don’t care what I drive so long as it’s functional. And it’s long been paid for. In cash.

  6. Bristol Traffic Team Says:

    A root cause here is probably the adoption of body-coloured bumpers. In the olden days -say 1992 and earlier- your bumpers would be a grey black colour that looked the same after parking as before, no matter how badly you did it. Then the marketing departments realised people would pay more for bumpers that matched the cars paintwork, and presumably that they would pay to have damage repaired more often.

    Amusingly, the SUV trend went the other way -away from single colour and towards “rugged look”. Same with integrated roof bars. Big vehicles: mount points for luggage like bikes and skis on the roof. Small vehicles, the ones with less room inside for bikes and skis: nothing.

  7. KelBel Says:

    I miss my old Volvo (made much later than the 70s, mind you). I backed into cars and things all the time when I was learning to drive, and you could never tell the difference.

Leave a Reply

Traffic Tom Vanderbilt

How We Drive is the companion blog to Tom Vanderbilt’s New York Times bestselling book, Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says About Us), published by Alfred A. Knopf in the U.S. and Canada, Penguin in the U.K, and in languages other than English by a number of other fine publishers worldwide.

Please send tips, news, research papers, links, photos (bad road signs, outrageous bumper stickers, spectacularly awful acts of driving or parking or anything traffic-related), or ideas for my Slate.com Transport column to me at: info@howwedrive.com.

For publicity inquiries, please contact Kate Runde at Vintage: krunde@randomhouse.com.

For editorial inquiries, please contact Zoe Pagnamenta at The Zoe Pagnamenta Agency: zoe@zpagency.com.

For speaking engagement inquiries, please contact
Jenna Meulemans at the Knopf Speaker Bureau.

Order Traffic from:

Amazon | B&N | Borders
Random House | Powell’s

[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Yahoo!]
U.S. Paperback UK Paperback
Traffic UK
Drive-on-the-left types can order the book from Amazon.co.uk.

For UK publicity enquiries please contact Rosie Glaisher at Penguin.

Upcoming Talks

[del.icio.us] [Digg] [Facebook] [Google] [MySpace] [Slashdot] [StumbleUpon] [Yahoo!]
Twitter
April 2010
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930