<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conveyor City</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/07/12/conveyor-city/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/07/12/conveyor-city/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 15:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Levinson</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/07/12/conveyor-city/#comment-15197</link>
		<dc:creator>David Levinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=1590#comment-15197</guid>
		<description>Seth Young, now at OSU,  has also done some work on moving walkways, showing how people respond to moving walkways by slowing down, and so they net out to almost no travel time improvement: 

http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/43265-moving-walkways-slower-than-walking-say-scientists

http://pubsindex.trb.org/view.aspx?id=453052

Perhaps you should have another blog "How we walk".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth Young, now at OSU,  has also done some work on moving walkways, showing how people respond to moving walkways by slowing down, and so they net out to almost no travel time improvement: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/43265-moving-walkways-slower-than-walking-say-scientists" rel="nofollow">http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/43265-moving-walkways-slower-than-walking-say-scientists</a></p>
<p><a href="http://pubsindex.trb.org/view.aspx?id=453052" rel="nofollow">http://pubsindex.trb.org/view.aspx?id=453052</a></p>
<p>Perhaps you should have another blog &#8220;How we walk&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul g. mattiuzzi</title>
		<link>http://www.howwedrive.com/2010/07/12/conveyor-city/#comment-15187</link>
		<dc:creator>paul g. mattiuzzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 18:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.howwedrive.com/?p=1590#comment-15187</guid>
		<description>Tom:

Great idea,  the Nimble Cities project at Slate!

But it is thoroughly hobbled by an absolutely unusable interface.   If we built transportation systems the way  Slate built that web application,  the world would look like L.A. during rush hour:  broken.   

You should run it all over again,  start from the beginning,  with a way for people to actually view,  read and discuss the ideas.  

paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom:</p>
<p>Great idea,  the Nimble Cities project at Slate!</p>
<p>But it is thoroughly hobbled by an absolutely unusable interface.   If we built transportation systems the way  Slate built that web application,  the world would look like L.A. during rush hour:  broken.   </p>
<p>You should run it all over again,  start from the beginning,  with a way for people to actually view,  read and discuss the ideas.  </p>
<p>paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

