Figure 8 Roundabout in Buffalo

A colleague sends the above photo of a “double roundabout,” in Buffalo, NY (or it’s suburbs). While your first thought might be, wow, how confusing, consider the Google Map image below that shows the original intersection — too big, actually two intersections masquerading as one (one can imagine cars getting “trapped” in that little extra segment, and box-blocking problems). Undoubtedly there was a crash problem, hence the double roundabout. Which are used in the U.K. (and taken to its logical extension in the “Magic Roundabout”, of course, but are, as far as I know, relatively novel here. Anyone live near here by chance and care to weigh in?

(thanks Nate)

This entry was posted on Thursday, September 9th, 2010 at 7:47 am and is filed under Traffic Engineering, Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

14 Responses to “Figure 8 Roundabout in Buffalo”

  1. Eric Says:

    In Massachusetts where I am from, roundabouts (or rotaries as we call them) are quite common. I like them personally and think they are quite efficient when everyone understands the rules and is basically courteous, but when a confused driver from out of state meets an aggressive “Masshole,” the rotary can cause more delays and potential accidents than typical intersections.

  2. bz2 Says:

    Solutions like that are reasonably common in the Netherlands. They’re referred to as ‘botonde’ (a pun on the Dutch words for ‘bone’ and ’roundabout’)

    The most common and most obvious use is at motorway exits, spanning over (or under) the motorway; in such circumstances, the roundabouts are not completely circumnavigable as the motorway ramps are all one-way and thus certain movements are not necessary. This effectively combines both roundabouts into a single one.

    A picture is worth a thousand words, so here’s a example to be built in Amsterdam:

    Other botondes provide a full roundabout on only one side:,6.510429&t=h&z=18,4.558597&t=h&z=17

    Or how about a botonde linked to a regular roundabout:,4.612858&t=h&z=18

    Note that in this last example, a car coming off Achterweg in the north and wishing to travel east would have to go all the way around both roundabouts. As is common around here, directness of journey for motor vehicles is not considered as important as things like safety, segregation, air quality and noise. Detouring cars a few hundred metres or sometimes even kilometres to avoid a residential area or potentially dangerous junction is considered acceptable.

  3. SteveL Says:

    1. In france they have to remind people to give way at roundabouts, because the normal rule “priorite a droite” doesn’t apply. Search for images of “vous n’avez pas la priorite” to see.

    2. There are in Bristol some places with two small “mini roundabouts” right after the other. They can be tricky as a lot of people will come out of one junction -with right of way- and are suddenly in a position without the right of way. The usual “one move lookahead” horizon effect kicks in, with trouble all round. I think to work best you need a minimum distance between roundabouts (measured in time between decisions) for safe use. Here’s a link to the satellite view,-2.608931&sspn=0.008116,0.014291&ie=UTF8&hq=&ll=51.457595,-2.612777&spn=0.001014,0.001786&t=h&z=19

    3. We have some lovely photographs up on Bristol Traffic of a mini-roundabout deadlock occurring

    while roundabouts do promise maximum throughput, they require on balanced exits and entries to every lane: if nobody exits onto your road, you don’t get a go. If everybody exits onto one road, the capacity becomes limited to that road’s throughput, and can trigger jams which block the roundabout altogether. You might think in the photo those cars are being selfish or short-sighted by pulling out and blocking the roundabout, but they know that if they don’t pull out, that they won’t get a chance for many minutes anyway -so they have nothing to lose.

  4. Charlie Says:

    It’s important to note that a roundabout and a rotary are not usually the same thing. Rotaries are usually larger, higher speed and don’t have much in the way of pavement markings. Roundabouts are smaller, lower-speed, and are clearly marked, making them more efficient and safer for cars as well as more hospitable for pedestrians and bicyclists. We do have a few roundabouts in Massachusetts, but not many, although more are being built.

  5. cycler Says:

    There’s a similar figure 8 in the Fresh Pond- Alewife area of Cambridge MA. In that case, the two rotaries are spaced maybe 1/8 mile apart (maybe not even that far) within easy sight distance of each other, but not quite as close as those shown above. That area handles a huge volume of commuter traffic in the mornings and evenings, and although it backs up pretty badly, I think it’s the fault of the downstream signals more than the rotaries.

  6. Bossi Says:

    The double roundabout configuration is uncommon, but not necessarily rare. It’s also just as easy to navigate as a single roundabout: they’re just two individual roundabouts albeit with a short connection in between.

    Also, roundabouts (different from circles & rotaries) tend to have overall reductions in crashes as compared to signals; and any crashes that do occur tend to be of significantly reduced severity owing to the lower travel speeds as well as similar movement paths at the collision point.

  7. Isaac Says:

    Not only do we have a “Figure 8 roundabout” here in Anchorage, AK, but it is also a figure-eight roundabout with DOUBLE LANES for added measure! ( While the jury is still out regarding the safety of the double-lane double-roundabout configuration, accidents at this intersection seem to have spiked since the intersections were modified. A news report captured one accident during an on-site filming for a story about the “second most dangerous intersection in Anchorage”(

    From what I can tell, the main problem is drivers get confused about which lane, the inside lane or outside lane, has the right-of-way when turning through the east and west ends of the figure-eight configuration. A humurous aside: there are at least 3 autobody shops located within 300 yards of this intersection.

  8. Richard Masoner Says:

    I’ve seen similar double roundabouts in Colorado somewhere, though I can’t remember where exactly…

  9. Todd Scott Says:

    I’ll see your doubles and raise you one. Metro Detroit has a triple roundabout — some which have two lanes — compliments of MDOT. It’s horrific in a car, impassable on foot, and death on a bike. The only time I’ve gone through it correctly was at 6am on a weekend when I could ignore all the signs and just drive where I wanted to go.,+Wayne,+Michigan&ll=42.506108,-83.759884&spn=0.010488,0.012875&z=17

    I just looked at the crash stats. There were 78 reported crashes on the western roundabout and 19 on the eastern roundabout in 2009 alone.

  10. Daniel Sack Says:

    I don’t like it. It is terrible for automobiles, worse for bicycles, and horrible for pedestrians.

    Maybe if every aspect of this plan were smaller it may have been okay. Someone told me the red area is not normally for driving on but people do anyway and it is helpful for large trucks – have not witnessed that, but I have seen confused automobile drivers on the red area.


  11. George Says:

    Contrary to popular belief a ‘well designed’ roundabout.
    1) Has better throughput that a signalized intersection or stop signs while reducing top speeds (speed kills).
    2) Has fewer and less much less severe accidents than signalized.
    3) Can be designed to be safer for pedestrians than signalized (cross on direction of traffic at a time).

    Go to for more details.
    Read traffic.

    Look at what Carmel Indiana has been doing with roundabouts and ‘dog bone roundabouts’ at freeway junctions with surface streets.
    George C

  12. TomL Says:

    Caltrans installed a pair of roundabouts about 5 years ago in Truckee, CA, where Highway 89 passes under Interstate 80. These circles are a tremendous improvement over the previous and inefficient system of off & on ramps and center turning lanes that used to back up cars for miles on holiday weekends.


    Sierra Sun article:

  13. Michiel Says:

    The examples bz2 shows leave out unnecessary parts of the roundabout, which makes it more safe and easier to navigate the roundabouts, especially at a diamond interchange.

  14. Karl McCracken (twitter: @KarlOnSea) Says:

    No. To really experience roundabout mayhem, you need to visit Swindon.

Leave a Reply

Traffic Tom Vanderbilt

How We Drive is the companion blog to Tom Vanderbilt’s New York Times bestselling book, Traffic: Why We Drive the Way We Do (and What It Says About Us), published by Alfred A. Knopf in the U.S. and Canada, Penguin in the U.K, and in languages other than English by a number of other fine publishers worldwide.

Please send tips, news, research papers, links, photos (bad road signs, outrageous bumper stickers, spectacularly awful acts of driving or parking or anything traffic-related), or ideas for my Transport column to me at:

For publicity inquiries, please contact Kate Runde at Vintage:

For editorial inquiries, please contact Zoe Pagnamenta at The Zoe Pagnamenta Agency:

For speaking engagement inquiries, please contact
Kim Thornton at the Random House Speakers Bureau:

Order Traffic from:

Amazon | B&N | Borders
Random House | Powell’s

U.S. Paperback UK Paperback
Traffic UK
Drive-on-the-left types can order the book from

For UK publicity enquiries please contact Rosie Glaisher at Penguin.

Upcoming Talks

April 9, 2008.
California Office of Traffic Safety Summit
San Francisco, CA.

May 19, 2009
University of Minnesota Center for Transportation Studies
Bloomington, MN

June 23, 2009
Driving Assessment 2009
Big Sky, Montana

June 26, 2009
PRI World Congress
Rotterdam, The Netherlands

June 27, 2009
Day of Architecture
Utrecht, The Netherlands

July 13, 2009
Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals (ATSIP)
Phoenix, AZ.

August 12-14
Texas Department of Transportation “Save a Life Summit”
San Antonio, Texas

September 2, 2009
Governors Highway Safety Association Annual Meeting
Savannah, Georgia

September 11, 2009
Oregon Transportation Summit
Portland, Oregon

October 8
Honda R&D Americas
Raymond, Ohio

October 10-11
INFORMS Roundtable
San Diego, CA

October 21, 2009
California State University-San Bernardino, Leonard Transportation Center
San Bernardino, CA

November 5
Southern New England Planning Association Planning Conference
Uncasville, Connecticut

January 6
Texas Transportation Forum
Austin, TX

January 19
Yale University
(with Donald Shoup; details to come)

Monday, February 22
Yale University School of Architecture
Eero Saarinen Lecture

Friday, March 19
University of Delaware
Delaware Center for Transportation

April 5-7
University of Utah
Salt Lake City
McMurrin Lectureship

April 19
International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (Organization Management Workshop)
Austin, Texas

Monday, April 26
Edmonton Traffic Safety Conference
Edmonton, Canada

Monday, June 7
Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals
Niagara Falls, Ontario

Wednesday, July 6
Fondo de Prevención Vial
Bogotá, Colombia

Tuesday, August 31
Royal Automobile Club
Perth, Australia

Wednesday, September 1
Australasian Road Safety Conference
Canberra, Australia

Wednesday, September 22

Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s
Traffic Incident Management Enhancement Program
Statewide Conference
Wisconsin Dells, WI

Wednesday, October 20
Rutgers University
Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation
Piscataway, NJ

Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Ontario Injury Prevention Resource Centre
Injury Prevention Forum

Monday, May 2
Idaho Public Driver Education Conference
Boise, Idaho

Tuesday, June 2, 2011
California Association of Cities
Costa Mesa, California

Sunday, August 21, 2011
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Attitudes: Iniciativa Social de Audi
Madrid, Spain

April 16, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Gardens Theatre, QUT
Brisbane, Australia

April 17, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Centennial Plaza, Sydney
Sydney, Australia

April 19, 2012
Institute for Sensible Transport Seminar
Melbourne Town Hall
Melbourne, Australia

January 30, 2013
University of Minnesota City Engineers Association Meeting
Minneapolis, MN

January 31, 2013
Metropolis and Mobile Life
School of Architecture, University of Toronto

February 22, 2013
ISL Engineering
Edmonton, Canada

March 1, 2013
Australian Road Summit
Melbourne, Australia

May 8, 2013
New York State Association of
Transportation Engineers
Rochester, NY

August 18, 2013 “Ingenuity” Conference
San Francisco, CA

September 26, 2013
TransComm 2013
(Meeting of American Association
of State Highway and Transportation
Officials’ Subcommittee on Transportation
Grand Rapids MI



September 2010
« Aug   Oct »

No, you probably won be compensated one million dollars; however, with the right blend of negotiating skills and patience, your efforts will be substantially rewarded!I have seen up to forty thousand dollars added to starting compensation through diligent negotiations. It is a way to significantly raise your standard of living and sense of self, simply by