March 26, 2009
Michigan Traffic Safety Summit.
East Lansing, Michigan.
April 9, 2008.
California Office of Traffic Safety Summit
San Francisco, CA.
May 19, 2009
University of Minnesota Center for Transportation Studies
Bloomington, MN
June 23, 2009
Driving Assessment 2009
Big Sky, Montana
June 26, 2009
PRI World Congress
Rotterdam, The Netherlands
June 27, 2009
Day of Architecture
Utrecht, The Netherlands
July 13, 2009
Association of Transportation Safety Information Professionals (ATSIP)
Phoenix, AZ.
August 12-14
Texas Department of Transportation “Save a Life Summit”
San Antonio, Texas
September 2, 2009
Governors Highway Safety Association Annual Meeting
Savannah, Georgia
September 11, 2009
Oregon Transportation Summit
Portland, Oregon
October 8
Honda R&D Americas
Raymond, Ohio
October 10-11
INFORMS Roundtable
San Diego, CA
October 21, 2009
California State University-San Bernardino, Leonard Transportation Center
San Bernardino, CA
November 5
Southern New England Planning Association Planning Conference
Uncasville, Connecticut
January 6
Texas Transportation Forum
Austin, TX
January 19
Yale University
(with Donald Shoup; details to come)
Monday, February 22
Yale University School of Architecture
Eero Saarinen Lecture
Friday, March 19
University of Delaware
Delaware Center for Transportation
April 5-7
University of Utah
Salt Lake City
McMurrin Lectureship
April 19
International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (Organization Management Workshop)
Austin, Texas
Monday, April 26
Edmonton Traffic Safety Conference
Edmonton, Canada
Monday, June 7
Canadian Association of Road Safety Professionals
Niagara Falls, Ontario
Wednesday, July 6
Fondo de Prevención Vial
Bogotá, Colombia
Tuesday, August 31
Royal Automobile Club
Perth, Australia
Wednesday, September 1
Australasian Road Safety Conference
Canberra, Australia
Wednesday, September 22
Wisconsin Department of Transportation’s
Traffic Incident Management Enhancement Program
Statewide Conference
Wisconsin Dells, WI
Wednesday, October 20
Rutgers University
Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation
Piscataway, NJ
Tuesday, March 8, 2011
Ontario Injury Prevention Resource Centre
Injury Prevention Forum
Toronto
Monday, May 2
Idaho Public Driver Education Conference
Boise, Idaho
Tuesday, June 2, 2011
California Association of Cities
Costa Mesa, California
Sunday, August 21, 2011
American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Attitudes: Iniciativa Social de Audi
Madrid, Spain
March 11th, 2011 at 6:50 am
The I-80/94 area is constantly under reconstruction and usually jammed with semis. The best way to avoid the area is via the tollway.
March 11th, 2011 at 11:20 am
I used to drive I-94 all the time. the only time there wasn’t a traffic issue was at 3am. Incidentally I learned to drive on 94 roughly around 3am. Great image; props to carinsurance.org
March 12th, 2011 at 11:40 am
In the graphic, your “miles per hours” are “mhp.”
March 13th, 2011 at 7:13 pm
They left out the easiest to implement and most obvious countermeasure to the “backward traveling wave” traffic jams — a safe following distance.
If, instead of tailgating, drivers simply left a reasonable cushion between their vehicle and the one ahead of them we could significantly reduce this type of congestion.
March 15th, 2011 at 5:41 pm
But Scott, wouldn’t those who want to maintain the safe distance also slow down? Eventually all that slowing down would still result in a crawl.
March 15th, 2011 at 7:01 pm
I’ve felt that a large proportion of crashes are caused by tailgating. Drivers will not improve driving habits in that respect, as the penalties are so small as to be non-existent. When I first learned to drive, I was a regular offender in that respect. Now it appears that following too closely is a factor in many road-rage reports and certainly in many published traffic crashes. I’ve noted a large number of school bus drivers will have insufficient distance from the bus ahead, when departing the depot.
The problem with traffic slowing down to maintain distance is that there are too many motor vehicles per given mile of roadway, the foundation of this article, but nothing seems to change that.
March 15th, 2011 at 9:26 pm
Stay alert.
Accelerate quickly.
Don’t go faster than the vehicle in front of you, unless you can safely go around.
Keep enough distance to slow down without braking (or braking little).
Get up to speed, and do it quickly.
March 16th, 2011 at 1:47 am
As per Scott, following too closely is a missing factor (according to Smith System, the most frequent driving error), but also speeding.
Speeding is what often leads to saturation when otherwise there would be plenty of room. Oddly enough, many drivers who maintain the minimum “adequate” following distance and refrain from tailgating will take your bumper off after passing.
In Montana, where they “sand” instead of salt the roads, this habit of many showers your windshield with gravel, and there may not be another vehicle in sight in either direction for 3 miles.
I once had my windshield replaced and didn’t make it to 10th gear before one of those showers busted it again.
March 16th, 2011 at 6:59 pm
KMG365 said, “But Scott, wouldn’t those who want to maintain the safe distance also slow down? Eventually all that slowing down would still result in a crawl.”
There is no need to slow down unless the traffic in front of you slows for some reason. If everyone follows at a safe distance there should be no reason to slow down.
March 17th, 2011 at 7:01 pm
Scott said: There is no need to slow down unless the traffic in front of you slows for some reason. If everyone follows at a safe distance there should be no reason to slow down.
That’s leaning toward the constant velocity fallacy.
Many if not most motorists hit the road every time expecting traffic to flow at a constant velocity, but it never does for long, and they’re as guilty as anyone.
Maintaining a constant velocity is not a skill many people practice once they are licensed. They tend to teach themselves to follow at a constant distance/close distance instead, which teaches them to not maintain a constant velocity, even though they still think they do, because they once ‘learned’ to.
That said, a monster following distance can be attained 90% of the time by operating at the speed limit. That way you don’t have to immediately react to every tiny traffic speed fluctuation. Then, the trick is to adjust your velocity early, in tiny increments, in response to what traffic is doing as far in the distance as you can see.
March 18th, 2011 at 7:47 pm
I don’t know about you, but when I get on the highway I set the cruise control and never change my speed until I get off the highway. My following distance is always several seconds (unless someone passes and then swerves back in in front of me).
You can’t get much more constant than that.
March 19th, 2011 at 9:06 am
Scott said: I don’t know about you, but when I get on the highway I set the cruise control and never change my speed until I get off the highway.
The specifics of that technique would be fascinating. Do you set it at 45 mph and stay in the L lane?
March 20th, 2011 at 1:34 pm
1. Merge onto highway.
2. Set cruise control at any speed less than or equal to 65 mph.
3. Drive.
March 21st, 2011 at 6:05 am
How do you eliminate slower traffic/8 cars coming down the entrance ramp 1 car-length apart/maintain the lane to the L available for your use whenever you need it…?
Or does your commute occur at 11pm and you only use the highway to travel 1 exit?